1
00:00:00,050 --> 00:00:02,330
The following content is
provided under a Creative

2
00:00:02,330 --> 00:00:03,610
Commons license.

3
00:00:03,610 --> 00:00:05,980
Your support will help
MIT OpenCourseWare

4
00:00:05,980 --> 00:00:09,495
continue to offer high quality
educational resources for free.

5
00:00:09,495 --> 00:00:12,540
To make a donation or to
view additional materials

6
00:00:12,540 --> 00:00:15,610
from hundreds of MIT courses,
visit MIT OpenCourseWare

7
00:00:15,610 --> 00:00:21,170
at ocw.mit.edu.

8
00:00:21,170 --> 00:00:23,070
PROFESSOR: And this
last little bit

9
00:00:23,070 --> 00:00:24,902
is something which is
not yet on the Web.

10
00:00:24,902 --> 00:00:26,860
But, anyway, when I was
walking out of the room

11
00:00:26,860 --> 00:00:29,740
last time, I noticed
that I'd written down

12
00:00:29,740 --> 00:00:32,070
the wrong formula for c_1 - c_2.

13
00:00:32,070 --> 00:00:35,380
There's a misprint, there's
a minus sign that's wrong.

14
00:00:35,380 --> 00:00:39,180
I claimed last time
that c_1 - c_2 was +1/2.

15
00:00:39,180 --> 00:00:40,580
But, actually, it's -1/2.

16
00:00:40,580 --> 00:00:42,080
If you go through
the calculation

17
00:00:42,080 --> 00:00:45,780
that we did with the
antiderivative of sin x cos x,

18
00:00:45,780 --> 00:00:48,500
we get these two
possible answers.

19
00:00:48,500 --> 00:00:52,900
And if they're to be equal,
then if we just subtract them

20
00:00:52,900 --> 00:00:56,300
we get c_1 - c_2 + 1/2 = 0.

21
00:00:56,300 --> 00:01:01,740
So c_1 - c_2 = 1/2.

22
00:01:01,740 --> 00:01:03,930
So, those are all
of the corrections.

23
00:01:03,930 --> 00:01:06,530
Again, everything here
will be on the Web.

24
00:01:06,530 --> 00:01:14,660
But just wanted to make
it all clear to you.

25
00:01:14,660 --> 00:01:15,410
So here we are.

26
00:01:15,410 --> 00:01:19,900
This is our last day of the
second unit, Applications

27
00:01:19,900 --> 00:01:22,010
of Differentiation.

28
00:01:22,010 --> 00:01:30,210
And I have one of the most fun
topics to introduce to you.

29
00:01:30,210 --> 00:01:32,530
Which is differential equations.

30
00:01:32,530 --> 00:01:35,410
Now, we have a whole course
on differential equations,

31
00:01:35,410 --> 00:01:38,140
which is called 18.03.

32
00:01:38,140 --> 00:01:43,840
And so we're only going
to do just a little bit.

33
00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:52,600
But I'm going to teach
you one technique.

34
00:01:52,600 --> 00:01:58,250
Which fits in precisely with
what we've been doing already.

35
00:01:58,250 --> 00:02:05,280
Which is differentials.

36
00:02:05,280 --> 00:02:08,480
The first and simplest kind
of differential equation

37
00:02:08,480 --> 00:02:12,770
is the rate of change
of x with respect to y

38
00:02:12,770 --> 00:02:16,770
is equal to some function f(x).

39
00:02:16,770 --> 00:02:19,020
Now, that's a perfectly
good differential equation.

40
00:02:19,020 --> 00:02:21,420
And we already
discussed last time

41
00:02:21,420 --> 00:02:26,204
that the solution, that
is, the function y,

42
00:02:26,204 --> 00:02:27,620
is going to be the
antiderivative,

43
00:02:27,620 --> 00:02:33,100
or the integral, of x.

44
00:02:33,100 --> 00:02:35,880
Now, for the purposes
of today, we're

45
00:02:35,880 --> 00:02:40,597
going to consider this
problem to be solved.

46
00:02:40,597 --> 00:02:41,930
That is, you can always do this.

47
00:02:41,930 --> 00:02:44,200
You can always take
antiderivatives.

48
00:02:44,200 --> 00:02:51,560
And for our purposes
now, that is for now,

49
00:02:51,560 --> 00:03:08,380
we only have one technique
to find antiderivatives.

50
00:03:08,380 --> 00:03:15,170
And that's called substitution.

51
00:03:15,170 --> 00:03:18,750
It has a very small
variant, which

52
00:03:18,750 --> 00:03:27,940
we called advanced guessing.

53
00:03:27,940 --> 00:03:29,820
And that works just as well.

54
00:03:29,820 --> 00:03:32,490
And that's basically all
that you'll ever need to do.

55
00:03:32,490 --> 00:03:36,457
As a practical matter, these are
the ones you'll face for now.

56
00:03:36,457 --> 00:03:38,540
Ones that you can actually
see what the answer is,

57
00:03:38,540 --> 00:03:42,640
or you'll have to
make a substitution.

58
00:03:42,640 --> 00:03:48,120
Now, the first tricky example,
or the first maybe interesting

59
00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:50,190
example of a
differential equation,

60
00:03:50,190 --> 00:04:00,750
which I'll call Example 2,
is going to be the following.

61
00:04:00,750 --> 00:04:07,510
d/dx + x acting on
y is equal to 0.

62
00:04:07,510 --> 00:04:10,580
So that's our first
differential equation that

63
00:04:10,580 --> 00:04:12,780
were going to try to solve.

64
00:04:12,780 --> 00:04:18,630
Apart from this standard
antiderivative approach.

65
00:04:18,630 --> 00:04:24,350
This operation here has a name.

66
00:04:24,350 --> 00:04:27,490
This actually has a name,
it's called the annihilation

67
00:04:27,490 --> 00:04:33,460
operator.

68
00:04:33,460 --> 00:04:43,780
And it's called that
in quantum mechanics.

69
00:04:43,780 --> 00:04:45,950
And there's a corresponding
creation operator

70
00:04:45,950 --> 00:04:50,780
where you change the
sign from plus to minus.

71
00:04:50,780 --> 00:04:53,660
And this is one of the simplest
differential equations.

72
00:04:53,660 --> 00:04:55,550
The reason why it's
studied in quantum

73
00:04:55,550 --> 00:04:58,360
mechanics all it that it
has very simple solutions

74
00:04:58,360 --> 00:05:00,500
that you can just write out.

75
00:05:00,500 --> 00:05:02,920
So we're going to
solve this equation.

76
00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:05,680
It's the one that
governs the ground state

77
00:05:05,680 --> 00:05:08,670
of the harmonic oscillator.

78
00:05:08,670 --> 00:05:10,790
So it has a lot of fancy
words associated with it,

79
00:05:10,790 --> 00:05:12,706
but it's a fairly simple
differential equation

80
00:05:12,706 --> 00:05:14,430
and it works perfectly
by the method

81
00:05:14,430 --> 00:05:17,270
that we're going to propose.

82
00:05:17,270 --> 00:05:20,820
So the first step
in this solution

83
00:05:20,820 --> 00:05:26,800
is just to rewrite the
equation by putting

84
00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:29,090
one of the terms on
the right-hand side.

85
00:05:29,090 --> 00:05:32,300
So this is dy/dx = -xy.

86
00:05:35,700 --> 00:05:37,700
Now, here is where
you see the difference

87
00:05:37,700 --> 00:05:41,210
between this type of equation
and the previous type.

88
00:05:41,210 --> 00:05:43,130
In the previous
equation, we just

89
00:05:43,130 --> 00:05:45,660
had a function of x on
the right-hand side.

90
00:05:45,660 --> 00:05:50,260
But here, the rate of change
depends on both x and y.

91
00:05:50,260 --> 00:05:51,830
So it's not clear
at all that we can

92
00:05:51,830 --> 00:05:55,110
solve this kind of equation.

93
00:05:55,110 --> 00:05:57,370
But there is a
remarkable trick which

94
00:05:57,370 --> 00:05:59,420
works very well in this case.

95
00:05:59,420 --> 00:06:02,710
Which is to use multiplication.

96
00:06:02,710 --> 00:06:06,340
To use this idea of differential
that we talked about last time.

97
00:06:06,340 --> 00:06:14,700
Namely, we divide by
y and multiply by dx.

98
00:06:14,700 --> 00:06:17,660
So now we've separated
the equation.

99
00:06:17,660 --> 00:06:20,750
We've separated out
the differentials.

100
00:06:20,750 --> 00:06:22,960
And what's going to
be important for us

101
00:06:22,960 --> 00:06:27,410
is that the left-hand side is
expressed solely in terms of y

102
00:06:27,410 --> 00:06:30,170
and the right-hand side is
expressed solely in terms of x.

103
00:06:30,170 --> 00:06:33,400
And we'll go through
this in careful detail.

104
00:06:33,400 --> 00:06:36,410
So now, the idea is if you've
set up the equation in terms

105
00:06:36,410 --> 00:06:39,680
of differentials as opposed
to ratios of differentials,

106
00:06:39,680 --> 00:06:44,680
or rates of change, now I
can use Leibniz's notation

107
00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:47,600
and integrate these
differentials.

108
00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:55,420
Take their antiderivatives.

109
00:06:55,420 --> 00:07:02,070
And we know what
each of these is.

110
00:07:02,070 --> 00:07:17,920
Namely, the left-hand side is
just-- Ah, well, that's tough.

111
00:07:17,920 --> 00:07:24,250
OK.

112
00:07:24,250 --> 00:07:29,410
I had an au pair who actually
did a lot of Tae Kwan Do.

113
00:07:29,410 --> 00:07:32,870
She could definitely defeat
any of you in any encounter,

114
00:07:32,870 --> 00:07:34,940
I promise.

115
00:07:34,940 --> 00:07:35,440
OK.

116
00:07:35,440 --> 00:07:37,870
Anyway.

117
00:07:37,870 --> 00:07:38,970
So, let's go back.

118
00:07:38,970 --> 00:07:41,970
We want to take the
antiderivative of this.

119
00:07:41,970 --> 00:07:48,130
So remember, this
is the function

120
00:07:48,130 --> 00:07:50,140
whose derivative is 1/y.

121
00:07:50,140 --> 00:07:52,320
And now there's a
slight novelty here.

122
00:07:52,320 --> 00:07:54,860
Here we're differentiating
the variable as x,

123
00:07:54,860 --> 00:07:58,220
and here we're differentiating
the variable as y.

124
00:07:58,220 --> 00:08:02,860
So the antiderivative
here is ln y.

125
00:08:02,860 --> 00:08:07,970
And the antiderivative on
the other side is -x^2 / 2.

126
00:08:07,970 --> 00:08:10,400
And they differ by a constant.

127
00:08:10,400 --> 00:08:17,620
So we have this
relationship here.

128
00:08:17,620 --> 00:08:19,660
Now, that's almost
the end of the story.

129
00:08:19,660 --> 00:08:23,100
We have to exponentiate to
express y in terms of x.

130
00:08:23,100 --> 00:08:26,970
So, e^(ln y) = e^(-x^2 / 2) + c.

131
00:08:29,880 --> 00:08:36,010
And now I can rewrite that as
y is equal to-- I'll write as A

132
00:08:36,010 --> 00:08:40,120
e^(-x^2 / 2), where A = e^c.

133
00:08:43,870 --> 00:08:47,940
And incidentally, we're just
taking the case y positive

134
00:08:47,940 --> 00:08:48,440
here.

135
00:08:48,440 --> 00:08:50,920
We'll talk about
what happens when

136
00:08:50,920 --> 00:08:55,590
y is negative in a few minutes.

137
00:08:55,590 --> 00:08:57,270
So here's the answer
to the question,

138
00:08:57,270 --> 00:09:02,040
almost, except for this fact
that I picked out y positive.

139
00:09:02,040 --> 00:09:09,890
Really, the solution is y
is equal to any multiple

140
00:09:09,890 --> 00:09:11,780
of e^(-x^2 / 2).

141
00:09:11,780 --> 00:09:19,310
Any constant a; a
positive, negative, or 0.

142
00:09:19,310 --> 00:09:22,240
Any constant will do.

143
00:09:22,240 --> 00:09:24,640
And we should double-check
that to make sure.

144
00:09:24,640 --> 00:09:32,930
If you take d/dx of y right,
that's going to be a d/dx

145
00:09:32,930 --> 00:09:33,950
e^(-x^2 / 2).

146
00:09:36,570 --> 00:09:38,220
And now by the
chain rule, you can

147
00:09:38,220 --> 00:09:42,080
see that this is a times
the factor of -x, that's

148
00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:45,080
the derivative of the
exponent, with respect to x,

149
00:09:45,080 --> 00:09:48,190
times the exponential.

150
00:09:48,190 --> 00:09:50,770
And now you just rearrange that.

151
00:09:50,770 --> 00:09:54,430
That's -xy.

152
00:09:54,430 --> 00:09:55,860
So it does check.

153
00:09:55,860 --> 00:09:57,360
These are solutions
to the equation.

154
00:09:57,360 --> 00:09:58,560
The a didn't matter.

155
00:09:58,560 --> 00:10:05,370
It didn't matter whether it
was positive or negative.

156
00:10:05,370 --> 00:10:08,750
This function is known as
the normal distribution,

157
00:10:08,750 --> 00:10:11,310
so it fits beautifully
with a lot of probability

158
00:10:11,310 --> 00:10:15,710
and probabilistic interpretation
of quantum mechanics.

159
00:10:15,710 --> 00:10:22,630
This is sort of where
the particle is.

160
00:10:22,630 --> 00:10:25,380
So next, what I'd
like to do is just

161
00:10:25,380 --> 00:10:30,920
go through the method in general
and point out when it works.

162
00:10:30,920 --> 00:10:32,960
And then I'll make
a few comments just

163
00:10:32,960 --> 00:10:37,650
to make sure that you understand
the technicalities of dealing

164
00:10:37,650 --> 00:10:39,590
with constants and so forth.

165
00:10:39,590 --> 00:10:42,385
So, first of all, the
general method of separation

166
00:10:42,385 --> 00:10:53,830
of variables.

167
00:10:53,830 --> 00:10:55,360
And here's when it works.

168
00:10:55,360 --> 00:10:58,470
It works when you're
faced with a differential

169
00:10:58,470 --> 00:11:03,410
equation of the form f(x) g(y).

170
00:11:03,410 --> 00:11:05,920
That's the situation
that we had.

171
00:11:05,920 --> 00:11:08,150
And I'll just illustrate that.

172
00:11:08,150 --> 00:11:09,820
Just to remind you here.

173
00:11:09,820 --> 00:11:11,650
Here's our equation.

174
00:11:11,650 --> 00:11:13,120
It's in that form.

175
00:11:13,120 --> 00:11:22,190
And the function f(x) is -x,
and the function g(y) is just y.

176
00:11:22,190 --> 00:11:26,670
And now, the way the method
works is, this separation step.

177
00:11:26,670 --> 00:11:30,370
From here to here,
this is the key step.

178
00:11:30,370 --> 00:11:35,070
This is the only
conceptually remarkable step,

179
00:11:35,070 --> 00:11:37,360
which all has to
do with the fact

180
00:11:37,360 --> 00:11:40,160
that Leibniz fixed his
notations up so that this

181
00:11:40,160 --> 00:11:42,190
works perfectly.

182
00:11:42,190 --> 00:11:48,320
And so that involves taking
the y, so dividing by g(y),

183
00:11:48,320 --> 00:11:53,170
and multiplying by
dx, it's comfortable

184
00:11:53,170 --> 00:11:55,540
because it feels like
ordinary arithmetic,

185
00:11:55,540 --> 00:11:59,430
even though these
are differentials.

186
00:11:59,430 --> 00:12:02,710
And then, we just
antidifferentiate.

187
00:12:02,710 --> 00:12:10,560
So we have a function, H, which
is the integral of dy / g(y),

188
00:12:10,560 --> 00:12:12,440
and we have another
function which

189
00:12:12,440 --> 00:12:15,910
is F. Note they are functions of
completely different variables

190
00:12:15,910 --> 00:12:16,740
here.

191
00:12:16,740 --> 00:12:20,850
Integral of f(x) dx.

192
00:12:20,850 --> 00:12:23,864
Now, in our example we did that.

193
00:12:23,864 --> 00:12:25,530
We carried out this
antidifferentiation,

194
00:12:25,530 --> 00:12:29,680
and this function
turned out to be ln y,

195
00:12:29,680 --> 00:12:39,630
and this function turned
out to be -x^2 / 2.

196
00:12:39,630 --> 00:12:42,350
And then we write
the relationship.

197
00:12:42,350 --> 00:12:45,790
Which is that if these
are both antiderivatives

198
00:12:45,790 --> 00:12:48,890
of the same thing, then they
have to differ by a constant.

199
00:12:48,890 --> 00:12:55,870
Or, in other words, H(y)
has to equal to F(x) + c.

200
00:12:55,870 --> 00:13:10,130
Where c is constant.

201
00:13:10,130 --> 00:13:15,150
Now, notice that
this kind of equation

202
00:13:15,150 --> 00:13:20,450
is what we call an
implicit equation.

203
00:13:20,450 --> 00:13:23,930
It's not quite a
formula for y, directly.

204
00:13:23,930 --> 00:13:26,330
It defines y implicitly.

205
00:13:26,330 --> 00:13:29,630
That's that top line up here.

206
00:13:29,630 --> 00:13:33,020
That's the implicit equation.

207
00:13:33,020 --> 00:13:35,110
In order to make it an
explicit equation, which

208
00:13:35,110 --> 00:13:38,780
is what is underneath, what I
have to do is take the inverse.

209
00:13:38,780 --> 00:13:41,260
So I write it as y
= H^(-1)(F(x) + c).

210
00:13:45,080 --> 00:13:48,140
Now, in real life the calculus
part is often pretty easy.

211
00:13:48,140 --> 00:13:52,620
And it can be quite messy
to do the inverse operation.

212
00:13:52,620 --> 00:13:55,850
So sometimes we just leave it
alone in the implicit form.

213
00:13:55,850 --> 00:13:58,250
But it's also
satisfying, sometimes,

214
00:13:58,250 --> 00:14:09,290
to write it in the
final form here.

215
00:14:09,290 --> 00:14:14,160
Now I've got to give you a few
little pieces of commentary

216
00:14:14,160 --> 00:14:16,640
before-- For those of you
walked in a little bit late,

217
00:14:16,640 --> 00:14:25,660
this will all be on the Web.

218
00:14:25,660 --> 00:14:31,180
So just a few pieces
of commentary.

219
00:14:31,180 --> 00:14:36,230
So if you like, some remarks.

220
00:14:36,230 --> 00:14:51,140
The first remark is that I
could have written natural log

221
00:14:51,140 --> 00:14:55,850
of absolute y is
equal to -x^2 / 2 + c.

222
00:14:58,390 --> 00:15:01,871
We learned last time that
the antiderivative works also

223
00:15:01,871 --> 00:15:02,870
for the negative values.

224
00:15:02,870 --> 00:15:08,490
So this would work
for y not equal to 0.

225
00:15:08,490 --> 00:15:10,900
Both for positive
and negative values.

226
00:15:10,900 --> 00:15:13,990
And you can see that that
would have captured most

227
00:15:13,990 --> 00:15:15,580
of the rest of the solution.

228
00:15:15,580 --> 00:15:21,870
Namely, |y| would be
equal to A e^(-x^2 / 2),

229
00:15:21,870 --> 00:15:24,800
by the same reasoning as before.

230
00:15:24,800 --> 00:15:29,052
And then that would mean that
y was plus or minus A e^(-x^2 /

231
00:15:29,052 --> 00:15:34,800
2), which is really
just what we got.

232
00:15:34,800 --> 00:15:38,120
Because, in fact, I
didn't bother with this.

233
00:15:38,120 --> 00:15:40,087
Because actually in
most-- and the reason why

234
00:15:40,087 --> 00:15:42,420
I'm going through this, by
the way, carefully this time,

235
00:15:42,420 --> 00:15:44,878
is that you're going to be
faced with this very frequently.

236
00:15:44,878 --> 00:15:47,290
The exponential function
comes up all the time.

237
00:15:47,290 --> 00:15:49,710
And so, therefore, you want
to be completely comfortable

238
00:15:49,710 --> 00:15:52,300
dealing with it.

239
00:15:52,300 --> 00:15:54,510
So this time I had
the positive A,

240
00:15:54,510 --> 00:15:56,540
while the negative A
fits in either this way,

241
00:15:56,540 --> 00:15:57,740
or I can throw it in.

242
00:15:57,740 --> 00:15:59,970
Because I know that that's
going to work that way.

243
00:15:59,970 --> 00:16:03,370
But of course, I
double-checked to be confident.

244
00:16:03,370 --> 00:16:07,380
Now, this still
leaves out one value.

245
00:16:07,380 --> 00:16:12,295
So, this still leaves
out-- So, if you like,

246
00:16:12,295 --> 00:16:14,420
what I have here now is a
is equal to plus or minus

247
00:16:14,420 --> 00:16:18,540
capital A. The capital A
one being the positive one.

248
00:16:18,540 --> 00:16:20,920
But this still
leaves out one case.

249
00:16:20,920 --> 00:16:23,480
Which is y = 0.

250
00:16:23,480 --> 00:16:27,180
Which is an extremely boring
solution, but nevertheless

251
00:16:27,180 --> 00:16:28,760
a solution to this problem.

252
00:16:28,760 --> 00:16:32,330
If you plug in 0 here
for y, you get 0.

253
00:16:32,330 --> 00:16:34,600
If you plug in 0
here for y, you get

254
00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:36,520
that these two sides are equal.

255
00:16:36,520 --> 00:16:38,080
0 = 0.

256
00:16:38,080 --> 00:16:40,630
Not a very interesting
answer to the question.

257
00:16:40,630 --> 00:16:42,290
But it's still an answer.

258
00:16:42,290 --> 00:16:43,930
And so y = 0 is left out..

259
00:16:43,930 --> 00:16:52,520
Well, that's not so surprising
that we missed that solution.

260
00:16:52,520 --> 00:16:56,360
Because in the process of
carrying out these operations,

261
00:16:56,360 --> 00:16:58,250
I divided by y.

262
00:16:58,250 --> 00:17:02,290
I did that right here.

263
00:17:02,290 --> 00:17:03,600
So, that's what happens.

264
00:17:03,600 --> 00:17:05,941
If you're going to do various
non-linear operations,

265
00:17:05,941 --> 00:17:08,190
in particular, if you're
going to divide by something,

266
00:17:08,190 --> 00:17:10,564
if it happens to be 0 you're
going to miss that solution.

267
00:17:10,564 --> 00:17:13,860
You might have problems
with that solution.

268
00:17:13,860 --> 00:17:16,870
But we have to live with that
because we want to get ahead.

269
00:17:16,870 --> 00:17:20,520
And we want to get the
formulas for various solutions.

270
00:17:20,520 --> 00:17:22,840
So that's the first remark
that I wanted to make.

271
00:17:22,840 --> 00:17:30,340
And now, the second
one is almost related

272
00:17:30,340 --> 00:17:33,380
to what I was just
discussing right here.

273
00:17:33,380 --> 00:17:37,240
That I'm erasing.

274
00:17:37,240 --> 00:17:39,420
And that's the following.

275
00:17:39,420 --> 00:17:52,100
I could have also written
ln y + c_1 = -x^2 / 2 + c_2.

276
00:17:52,100 --> 00:17:54,300
Where c_1 and c_2 are
different constants.

277
00:17:54,300 --> 00:17:57,210
When I'm faced with this
antidifferentiation,

278
00:17:57,210 --> 00:17:59,460
I just taught you last
time, that you want

279
00:17:59,460 --> 00:18:02,230
to have an arbitrary constant.

280
00:18:02,230 --> 00:18:06,760
Here and there, in both slots.

281
00:18:06,760 --> 00:18:09,480
So I perfectly well could
have written this down.

282
00:18:09,480 --> 00:18:17,990
But notice that I can rewrite
this as ln y = -x^2 / 2 + c_2 -

283
00:18:17,990 --> 00:18:20,190
c_1.

284
00:18:20,190 --> 00:18:22,250
I can subtract.

285
00:18:22,250 --> 00:18:25,385
And then, if I just combine
these two guys together

286
00:18:25,385 --> 00:18:29,060
and name them c, I have
a different constant.

287
00:18:29,060 --> 00:18:32,010
In other words, it's
superfluous and redundant

288
00:18:32,010 --> 00:18:35,060
to have two arbitrary
constants here,

289
00:18:35,060 --> 00:18:38,260
because they can always
be combined into one.

290
00:18:38,260 --> 00:18:47,010
So two constants
are superfluous.

291
00:18:47,010 --> 00:18:54,430
Can always be combined.

292
00:18:54,430 --> 00:18:56,490
So we just never do
it this first way.

293
00:18:56,490 --> 00:19:05,260
It's just extra writing,
it's a waste of time.

294
00:19:05,260 --> 00:19:08,120
There's one other subtle
remark, which you won't actually

295
00:19:08,120 --> 00:19:10,020
appreciate until you've
done several problems

296
00:19:10,020 --> 00:19:11,280
in this direction.

297
00:19:11,280 --> 00:19:14,490
Which is that the
constant appears

298
00:19:14,490 --> 00:19:18,900
additive here, in this first
solution to the problem.

299
00:19:18,900 --> 00:19:22,590
But when I do this nonlinear
operation of exponentiation,

300
00:19:22,590 --> 00:19:26,390
it now becomes
multiplicative constant.

301
00:19:26,390 --> 00:19:31,006
And so, in general, there's
a free constant somewhere

302
00:19:31,006 --> 00:19:31,630
in the problem.

303
00:19:31,630 --> 00:19:35,490
But it's not always
an additive constant.

304
00:19:35,490 --> 00:19:38,330
It's only an additive constant
right at the first step

305
00:19:38,330 --> 00:19:39,890
when you take the
antiderivative.

306
00:19:39,890 --> 00:19:42,265
And then after that, when you
do all your other nonlinear

307
00:19:42,265 --> 00:19:45,440
operations, it can turn
into anything at all.

308
00:19:45,440 --> 00:19:47,980
So you should always expect it
to be something slightly more

309
00:19:47,980 --> 00:19:49,563
interesting than an
additive constant.

310
00:19:49,563 --> 00:19:59,060
Although occasionally it
stays an additive constant.

311
00:19:59,060 --> 00:20:01,180
The last little
bit of commentary

312
00:20:01,180 --> 00:20:06,010
that I want to make just goes
back to the original problem

313
00:20:06,010 --> 00:20:06,810
here.

314
00:20:06,810 --> 00:20:09,680
Which is right here.

315
00:20:09,680 --> 00:20:11,190
The example 1.

316
00:20:11,190 --> 00:20:14,490
And I want to solve it, even
though this is simpleminded.

317
00:20:14,490 --> 00:20:21,490
But Example 1 via separation.

318
00:20:21,490 --> 00:20:25,290
So that you see our variables.

319
00:20:25,290 --> 00:20:28,440
So that you see what it does.

320
00:20:28,440 --> 00:20:34,230
The situation is this.

321
00:20:34,230 --> 00:20:35,890
And the separation
just means you

322
00:20:35,890 --> 00:20:38,570
put the dx on the other side.

323
00:20:38,570 --> 00:20:44,030
So this is dy = f(x) dx.

324
00:20:44,030 --> 00:20:54,680
And then we integrate.

325
00:20:54,680 --> 00:20:58,170
And the antiderivative
of dy is just y.

326
00:20:58,170 --> 00:21:03,490
So this is the solution
to the problem.

327
00:21:03,490 --> 00:21:05,170
And it's just what
we wrote before;

328
00:21:05,170 --> 00:21:07,480
it's just a funny notation.

329
00:21:07,480 --> 00:21:19,480
And it comes to the same
thing as the antiderivative.

330
00:21:19,480 --> 00:21:23,240
OK, so now we're going to
go on to a trickier problem.

331
00:21:23,240 --> 00:21:24,090
A trickier example.

332
00:21:24,090 --> 00:21:26,420
We need one or two more
just to get some practice

333
00:21:26,420 --> 00:21:29,330
with this method.

334
00:21:29,330 --> 00:21:31,730
Everybody happy so far?

335
00:21:31,730 --> 00:21:32,240
Question.

336
00:21:32,240 --> 00:21:53,472
STUDENT: [INAUDIBLE]

337
00:21:53,472 --> 00:21:55,180
PROFESSOR: So, the
question is, how do we

338
00:21:55,180 --> 00:21:58,150
deal with this ambiguity.

339
00:21:58,150 --> 00:22:03,020
I'm summarizing very,
very, briefly what I heard.

340
00:22:03,020 --> 00:22:06,530
Well, you know, sometimes
a > 0, sometimes a < 0,

341
00:22:06,530 --> 00:22:07,550
sometimes it's not.

342
00:22:07,550 --> 00:22:12,810
So there's a name for this guy.

343
00:22:12,810 --> 00:22:20,136
Which is that this is what's
called the general solution.

344
00:22:20,136 --> 00:22:22,010
In other words, the
whole family of solutions

345
00:22:22,010 --> 00:22:24,460
is the answer to the question.

346
00:22:24,460 --> 00:22:28,020
Now, it could be that you're
given extra information.

347
00:22:28,020 --> 00:22:31,760
If you're given extra
information, that might be,

348
00:22:31,760 --> 00:22:33,527
and this is very typical
in such problems,

349
00:22:33,527 --> 00:22:35,610
you have the rate of change
of the function, which

350
00:22:35,610 --> 00:22:36,510
is what we've given.

351
00:22:36,510 --> 00:22:39,780
But you might also have
the place where it starts.

352
00:22:39,780 --> 00:22:44,579
Which would be,
say, it starts at 3.

353
00:22:44,579 --> 00:22:46,620
Now, if you have that
extra piece of information,

354
00:22:46,620 --> 00:22:50,670
then you can nail down
exactly which function it is.

355
00:22:50,670 --> 00:22:52,420
If you do that,
if you plug in 3,

356
00:22:52,420 --> 00:22:57,860
you see that a times
e^(-0^2 / 2) is equal to 3.

357
00:22:57,860 --> 00:23:00,300
So a = 3.

358
00:23:00,300 --> 00:23:02,720
And the answer is
y = 3e^(-x^2 / 2).

359
00:23:06,140 --> 00:23:08,940
And similarly, if it's negative,
if it starts out negative,

360
00:23:08,940 --> 00:23:10,100
it'll stay negative.

361
00:23:10,100 --> 00:23:11,100
For instance.

362
00:23:11,100 --> 00:23:14,870
If it starts out 0, it'll stay
0, this particular function

363
00:23:14,870 --> 00:23:16,100
here.

364
00:23:16,100 --> 00:23:18,110
So the answer to
your question is how

365
00:23:18,110 --> 00:23:19,700
you deal with the ambiguity.

366
00:23:19,700 --> 00:23:23,620
The answer is that you simply
say what the solution is.

367
00:23:23,620 --> 00:23:25,200
And the solution is
not one function,

368
00:23:25,200 --> 00:23:26,324
it's a family of functions.

369
00:23:26,324 --> 00:23:30,340
It's a list and you have to have
what's known as a parameter.

370
00:23:30,340 --> 00:23:32,440
And that parameter
gets nailed down

371
00:23:32,440 --> 00:23:35,240
if you tell me more
information about the function.

372
00:23:35,240 --> 00:23:37,654
Not the rate of change, but
something about the values

373
00:23:37,654 --> 00:23:38,320
of the function.

374
00:23:46,620 --> 00:23:53,660
STUDENT: [INAUDIBLE]

375
00:23:53,660 --> 00:23:55,720
PROFESSOR: The general
solution is this solution.

376
00:23:55,720 --> 00:23:56,553
STUDENT: [INAUDIBLE]

377
00:23:56,553 --> 00:23:58,176
PROFESSOR: And I'm
showing you here

378
00:23:58,176 --> 00:24:00,300
that you could get to most
of the general solution.

379
00:24:00,300 --> 00:24:04,570
There's one thing that's left
out, namely the case a = 0.

380
00:24:04,570 --> 00:24:08,120
So, in other words, I would
not go through this method.

381
00:24:08,120 --> 00:24:10,690
I would only use this,
which is simpler.

382
00:24:10,690 --> 00:24:13,590
But then I have to understand
that I haven't gotten

383
00:24:13,590 --> 00:24:15,410
all of the solutions this way.

384
00:24:15,410 --> 00:24:19,325
I'm going to need to throw in
all the rest of the solutions.

385
00:24:19,325 --> 00:24:20,950
So in the back of
your head, you always

386
00:24:20,950 --> 00:24:23,779
have to have something
like this in mind.

387
00:24:23,779 --> 00:24:25,570
So that you can generate
all the solutions.

388
00:24:25,570 --> 00:24:28,510
This is very suggestive, right?

389
00:24:28,510 --> 00:24:31,840
The restriction, it turns
that the restriction A > 0 is

390
00:24:31,840 --> 00:24:40,660
superfluous, is unnecessary.

391
00:24:40,660 --> 00:24:46,180
But that, we only get by
further thought and by checking.

392
00:24:46,180 --> 00:24:46,890
Another question?

393
00:24:46,890 --> 00:24:47,389
Over here.

394
00:24:47,389 --> 00:24:52,210
STUDENT: [INAUDIBLE]

395
00:24:52,210 --> 00:24:54,630
PROFESSOR: The aim of
differential equations

396
00:24:54,630 --> 00:24:55,600
is to solve them.

397
00:24:55,600 --> 00:24:59,372
Just as with
algebraic equations.

398
00:24:59,372 --> 00:25:01,330
Usually, differential
equations are telling you

399
00:25:01,330 --> 00:25:04,300
something about the balance
between an acceleration

400
00:25:04,300 --> 00:25:05,980
and a velocity.

401
00:25:05,980 --> 00:25:09,840
If you have a falling object,
it might have a resistance.

402
00:25:09,840 --> 00:25:11,210
It's telling you something.

403
00:25:11,210 --> 00:25:13,700
So, actually, sometimes
in applied problems,

404
00:25:13,700 --> 00:25:16,450
formulating what differential
equation describe

405
00:25:16,450 --> 00:25:18,310
this situation is
very important.

406
00:25:18,310 --> 00:25:21,910
In order to see that
that's the right thing,

407
00:25:21,910 --> 00:25:24,330
you have to have solved
it to see that it fits

408
00:25:24,330 --> 00:25:25,780
the data that you're getting.

409
00:25:25,780 --> 00:25:28,570
STUDENT: [INAUDIBLE]

410
00:25:28,570 --> 00:25:31,720
PROFESSOR: The question is, can
you solve for x instead of y.

411
00:25:31,720 --> 00:25:36,250
The answer is, sure.

412
00:25:36,250 --> 00:25:38,356
That's the same
thing as-- so that

413
00:25:38,356 --> 00:25:40,230
would be the inverse
function of the function

414
00:25:40,230 --> 00:25:42,520
that we're officially
looking for.

415
00:25:42,520 --> 00:25:43,960
But yeah, it's legal.

416
00:25:43,960 --> 00:25:46,150
In other words,
oftentimes we're stuck

417
00:25:46,150 --> 00:25:48,835
with just the implicit,
some implicit formula

418
00:25:48,835 --> 00:25:51,540
and sometimes we're stuck with
a formula x is a function of y

419
00:25:51,540 --> 00:25:54,730
versus y is a function of x.

420
00:25:54,730 --> 00:25:57,850
The way in which the
function is specified

421
00:25:57,850 --> 00:26:00,780
is something that
can be complicated.

422
00:26:00,780 --> 00:26:02,810
As you'll see in
the next example,

423
00:26:02,810 --> 00:26:04,760
it's not necessarily
the best thing

424
00:26:04,760 --> 00:26:07,530
to think about a function--
y as a function of x.

425
00:26:07,530 --> 00:26:12,170
Well, in the fourth example.

426
00:26:12,170 --> 00:26:27,000
Alright, we're going to go on
and do our next example here.

427
00:26:27,000 --> 00:26:32,440
So the third example
is going to be taken

428
00:26:32,440 --> 00:26:36,090
as a kind of geometry problem.

429
00:26:36,090 --> 00:26:38,990
I'll draw a picture of it.

430
00:26:38,990 --> 00:26:44,180
Suppose you have a curve
with the following property.

431
00:26:44,180 --> 00:26:50,730
If you take a point on the
curve, and you take the ray,

432
00:26:50,730 --> 00:26:56,224
you take the ray from the origin
to the curve, well, that's not

433
00:26:56,224 --> 00:26:57,390
going to be one that I want.

434
00:26:57,390 --> 00:27:00,350
I think I'm going to want
something which is steeper.

435
00:27:00,350 --> 00:27:02,130
Because what I'm
going to insist is

436
00:27:02,130 --> 00:27:09,050
that the tangent line be
twice as steep as the ray

437
00:27:09,050 --> 00:27:10,490
from the origin.

438
00:27:10,490 --> 00:27:19,600
So, in other words,
slope of tangent line

439
00:27:19,600 --> 00:27:31,540
equals twice slope
of ray from origin.

440
00:27:31,540 --> 00:27:34,110
So the slope of this
orange line is twice

441
00:27:34,110 --> 00:27:39,410
the slope of the pink line.

442
00:27:39,410 --> 00:27:41,240
Now, these kinds of
geometric problems

443
00:27:41,240 --> 00:27:48,700
can be written very succinctly
with differential equations.

444
00:27:48,700 --> 00:27:51,530
Namely, it's just the
following. dy / dx,

445
00:27:51,530 --> 00:27:55,340
that's the slope of the
tangent line, is equal to,

446
00:27:55,340 --> 00:27:58,030
well remember what the
slope of this ray is,

447
00:27:58,030 --> 00:28:00,700
if this point-- I
need a notation.

448
00:28:00,700 --> 00:28:04,520
At this point is (x, y) which
is a point on the curve.

449
00:28:04,520 --> 00:28:07,860
So the slope of this
pink line is what?

450
00:28:07,860 --> 00:28:09,650
STUDENT: [INAUDIBLE]

451
00:28:09,650 --> 00:28:12,610
PROFESSOR: y/x.

452
00:28:12,610 --> 00:28:20,810
So if it's twice it,
there's the equation.

453
00:28:20,810 --> 00:28:28,040
OK, now, we only have one method
for solving these equations.

454
00:28:28,040 --> 00:28:29,890
So let's use it.

455
00:28:29,890 --> 00:28:31,620
It says to separate variables.

456
00:28:31,620 --> 00:28:41,000
So I write dy / y here,
is equal to 2 dx / x.

457
00:28:41,000 --> 00:28:42,530
That's the basic separation.

458
00:28:42,530 --> 00:28:47,990
That's the procedure that
we're always going to use.

459
00:28:47,990 --> 00:28:54,640
And now if I
integrate that, I find

460
00:28:54,640 --> 00:29:03,250
that on the right-hand side
I have the logarithm of y.

461
00:29:03,250 --> 00:29:05,380
And on the left-hand--
Sorry, on the left-hand side

462
00:29:05,380 --> 00:29:06,590
I have the logarithm of y.

463
00:29:06,590 --> 00:29:10,500
On the right-hand side, I
have twice the logarithm

464
00:29:10,500 --> 00:29:20,150
of x, plus a constant.

465
00:29:20,150 --> 00:29:27,330
So let's see what
happens to this example.

466
00:29:27,330 --> 00:29:29,846
This is an implicit
equation, and of course we

467
00:29:29,846 --> 00:29:31,970
have the problems of the
plus or minus signs, which

468
00:29:31,970 --> 00:29:38,070
I'm not going to worry
about until later.

469
00:29:38,070 --> 00:29:40,320
So let's exponentiate
and see what happens.

470
00:29:40,320 --> 00:29:43,600
We get e^(ln y)
= e^(2 ln x + c).

471
00:29:47,340 --> 00:29:51,940
So, again, this is y
on the left-hand side.

472
00:29:51,940 --> 00:29:54,010
And on the right-hand
side, if you think about it

473
00:29:54,010 --> 00:29:55,770
for a second, it's (e^(ln x))^2.

474
00:29:59,050 --> 00:30:00,370
Which is x^2.

475
00:30:00,370 --> 00:30:02,680
So this is x^2, and
then there's an e^c.

476
00:30:02,680 --> 00:30:06,390
So that's another one
of these A factors here.

477
00:30:06,390 --> 00:30:13,240
A = e^c.

478
00:30:13,240 --> 00:30:20,160
So the answer is, well,
I'll draw the picture.

479
00:30:20,160 --> 00:30:22,530
And I'm going to
cheat as I did before.

480
00:30:22,530 --> 00:30:24,550
We skipped the case y negative.

481
00:30:24,550 --> 00:30:30,236
We really only did the
case y positive, so far.

482
00:30:30,236 --> 00:30:31,860
But if you think
about it for a second,

483
00:30:31,860 --> 00:30:33,490
and we'll check it
in a second, you're

484
00:30:33,490 --> 00:30:36,390
going to get all of
these parabolas here.

485
00:30:36,390 --> 00:30:40,970
So the solution is this
family of functions.

486
00:30:40,970 --> 00:30:44,330
And they can be bending down.

487
00:30:44,330 --> 00:30:45,660
As well as up.

488
00:30:45,660 --> 00:30:48,140
So these are the solutions
to this equation.

489
00:30:48,140 --> 00:30:50,410
Every single one of these
curves has the property

490
00:30:50,410 --> 00:30:52,750
that if you pick a point
on it, the tangent line

491
00:30:52,750 --> 00:30:58,050
has twice the slope of
the ray to the origin.

492
00:30:58,050 --> 00:31:01,840
And the formula, if you like,
of the general solution is y =

493
00:31:01,840 --> 00:31:08,960
ax^2, a is any constant.

494
00:31:08,960 --> 00:31:09,460
Question?

495
00:31:09,460 --> 00:31:21,844
STUDENT: [INAUDIBLE]

496
00:31:21,844 --> 00:31:22,510
PROFESSOR: Yeah.

497
00:31:22,510 --> 00:31:28,960
So again - so first
of all, so there

498
00:31:28,960 --> 00:31:30,110
are two approaches to this.

499
00:31:30,110 --> 00:31:32,900
One is to check it, and
make sure that it's right.

500
00:31:32,900 --> 00:31:35,140
When a formula works for
some family of values,

501
00:31:35,140 --> 00:31:36,740
sometimes it works for others.

502
00:31:36,740 --> 00:31:39,650
But another one is to realize
that these things will usually

503
00:31:39,650 --> 00:31:40,970
work out this way.

504
00:31:40,970 --> 00:31:45,459
Because in this argument here,
I allow the absolute value.

505
00:31:45,459 --> 00:31:47,750
And that would have been a
perfectly legal thing for me

506
00:31:47,750 --> 00:31:48,250
to do.

507
00:31:48,250 --> 00:31:51,220
I could have put in
absolute values here.

508
00:31:51,220 --> 00:31:55,690
In which case, I would've gotten
that the absolute value of this

509
00:31:55,690 --> 00:31:56,890
was equal to that.

510
00:31:56,890 --> 00:32:02,370
And now you see I've covered
the plus and minus cases.

511
00:32:02,370 --> 00:32:03,880
So it's that same idea.

512
00:32:03,880 --> 00:32:11,180
This implies that y is equal
to either Ax^2 or -Ax^2,

513
00:32:11,180 --> 00:32:14,100
depending on which
sign you pick.

514
00:32:14,100 --> 00:32:21,210
So that allows me for the
curves above and curves below.

515
00:32:21,210 --> 00:32:25,470
Because it's really true that
the antiderivative here is this

516
00:32:25,470 --> 00:32:26,240
function.

517
00:32:26,240 --> 00:32:28,820
It's defined for y negative.

518
00:32:28,820 --> 00:32:33,840
So let's just double-check.

519
00:32:33,840 --> 00:32:39,460
In this case, what's happening,
we have y = ax^2 and we want

520
00:32:39,460 --> 00:32:44,410
to compute dy/dx to make sure
that it satisfies the equation

521
00:32:44,410 --> 00:32:46,040
that I started out with.

522
00:32:46,040 --> 00:32:50,890
And what I see here
is that this is 2ax.

523
00:32:50,890 --> 00:32:53,370
And now I'm going to write
this in a suggestive way.

524
00:32:53,370 --> 00:33:00,330
I'm going to write
it as 2ax^2 / x.

525
00:33:00,330 --> 00:33:06,610
And, sure enough,
this is 2y / x.

526
00:33:06,610 --> 00:33:08,810
It does not matter
whether a-- it

527
00:33:08,810 --> 00:33:17,370
works for a positive,
a negative, a equals 0.

528
00:33:17,370 --> 00:33:24,180
It's OK.

529
00:33:24,180 --> 00:33:29,770
Again, we didn't pick up by
this method the a = 0 case.

530
00:33:29,770 --> 00:33:35,350
And that's not surprising
because we divided by y.

531
00:33:35,350 --> 00:33:39,660
There's another thing to watch
out about, about this example.

532
00:33:39,660 --> 00:33:41,990
So there's another warning.

533
00:33:41,990 --> 00:33:44,910
Which I have to give you.

534
00:33:44,910 --> 00:33:47,130
And this is a subtlety
which you definitely

535
00:33:47,130 --> 00:33:50,090
won't get to in any
detail until you

536
00:33:50,090 --> 00:33:54,070
get to a higher level ordinary
differential equations course,

537
00:33:54,070 --> 00:33:56,980
but I do want to warn
you about it right now.

538
00:33:56,980 --> 00:34:05,310
Which is that if you
look at the equation,

539
00:34:05,310 --> 00:34:14,100
you need to watch out that
it's undefined at x = 0.

540
00:34:14,100 --> 00:34:15,700
It's undefined at x = 0.

541
00:34:15,700 --> 00:34:20,350
We also divided by x,
and x is also a problem.

542
00:34:20,350 --> 00:34:24,690
Now, that actually has
an important consequence.

543
00:34:24,690 --> 00:34:27,820
Which is that, strangely,
knowing the value here

544
00:34:27,820 --> 00:34:31,040
and knowing the rate of change
doesn't specify this function.

545
00:34:31,040 --> 00:34:33,180
This is bad.

546
00:34:33,180 --> 00:34:36,160
And it violates one of
our pieces of intuition.

547
00:34:36,160 --> 00:34:38,720
And what's going wrong is
that the rate of change

548
00:34:38,720 --> 00:34:40,600
was not specified.

549
00:34:40,600 --> 00:34:43,560
It's undefined at x = 0.

550
00:34:43,560 --> 00:34:45,260
So there's a problem
here, and in fact

551
00:34:45,260 --> 00:34:48,220
if you think carefully about
what this function is doing,

552
00:34:48,220 --> 00:34:53,510
it could come in on one branch
and leave on a completely

553
00:34:53,510 --> 00:34:56,050
different branch.

554
00:34:56,050 --> 00:35:01,541
It doesn't really have to
obey any rule across x = 0.

555
00:35:01,541 --> 00:35:03,540
So you should really be
thinking of these things

556
00:35:03,540 --> 00:35:05,860
as rays emanating
from the origin.

557
00:35:05,860 --> 00:35:10,140
The origin was a special point
in the whole geometric problem.

558
00:35:10,140 --> 00:35:15,080
Rather than as being
complete parabolas.

559
00:35:15,080 --> 00:35:16,460
But that's a very subtle point.

560
00:35:16,460 --> 00:35:23,270
I don't expect you to be able
to say anything about it.

561
00:35:23,270 --> 00:35:25,920
But I just want to warn
you that it really is true

562
00:35:25,920 --> 00:35:30,640
that when x = 0 there's a
problem for this differential

563
00:35:30,640 --> 00:35:33,810
equation.

564
00:35:33,810 --> 00:35:46,570
So now, let me say
our next problem.

565
00:35:46,570 --> 00:35:47,690
Next example.

566
00:35:47,690 --> 00:35:52,370
Just another geometry question.

567
00:35:52,370 --> 00:36:01,430
So here's Example 4.

568
00:36:01,430 --> 00:36:04,430
I'm just going to use the
example that we've already got.

569
00:36:04,430 --> 00:36:09,090
Because there's only
so much time left here.

570
00:36:09,090 --> 00:36:23,480
The fourth example is to
take the curves perpendicular

571
00:36:23,480 --> 00:36:31,610
to the parabolas.

572
00:36:31,610 --> 00:36:33,332
This is another
geometry problem.

573
00:36:33,332 --> 00:36:35,040
And by specifying that
the the curves are

574
00:36:35,040 --> 00:36:37,020
perpendicular to
these parabolas,

575
00:36:37,020 --> 00:36:44,500
I'm telling you
what their slope is.

576
00:36:44,500 --> 00:36:47,000
So let's think about that.

577
00:36:47,000 --> 00:36:48,900
What's the new equation?

578
00:36:48,900 --> 00:36:56,270
The new diff. eq.
is the following.

579
00:36:56,270 --> 00:37:01,550
It's that the slope is equal
to the negative reciprocal

580
00:37:01,550 --> 00:37:05,610
of the slope of
the tangent line.

581
00:37:05,610 --> 00:37:14,850
Of tangent to the parabola.

582
00:37:14,850 --> 00:37:16,800
So that's the equation.

583
00:37:16,800 --> 00:37:19,270
That's actually fairly
easy to write down,

584
00:37:19,270 --> 00:37:26,570
because it's -1
divided by 2 y/x.

585
00:37:26,570 --> 00:37:32,281
That's the slope
of the parabola.

586
00:37:32,281 --> 00:37:32,780
2y/x.

587
00:37:36,860 --> 00:37:38,300
So let's rewrite that.

588
00:37:38,300 --> 00:37:52,160
Now, this is-- the x goes in
the numerator, so it's -x/(2y).

589
00:37:52,160 --> 00:37:57,990
And now I want to
solve this one.

590
00:37:57,990 --> 00:38:01,780
Well, again, there's
only one technique.

591
00:38:01,780 --> 00:38:10,240
Which is we're going
to separate variables.

592
00:38:10,240 --> 00:38:12,010
And we separate the
differentials here,

593
00:38:12,010 --> 00:38:18,201
so we get 2y dy = -x dx.

594
00:38:18,201 --> 00:38:20,200
That's just looking at
the equation that I have,

595
00:38:20,200 --> 00:38:22,640
which is right over here.

596
00:38:22,640 --> 00:38:30,760
dy/dx = -x/(2y), and
cross-multiplying to get this.

597
00:38:30,760 --> 00:38:33,100
And now I can take
the antiderivative.

598
00:38:33,100 --> 00:38:35,850
This is y^2.

599
00:38:35,850 --> 00:38:40,670
And the antiderivative
over here is -x^2 / 2 + c.

600
00:38:44,410 --> 00:38:57,410
And so, the solutions are x^2
/ 2 + y^2 is equal to some c,

601
00:38:57,410 --> 00:39:02,600
some constant c.

602
00:39:02,600 --> 00:39:06,460
Now, this time, things
don't work the same.

603
00:39:06,460 --> 00:39:09,600
And you can't expect them
always to work the same.

604
00:39:09,600 --> 00:39:11,550
I claimed that
this must be true.

605
00:39:11,550 --> 00:39:16,910
But unfortunately I cannot
insist that every c will work.

606
00:39:16,910 --> 00:39:21,040
As you can see here, only
the positive numbers c

607
00:39:21,040 --> 00:39:24,980
can work here.

608
00:39:24,980 --> 00:39:28,720
So the picture is that
something slightly different

609
00:39:28,720 --> 00:39:29,530
happened here.

610
00:39:29,530 --> 00:39:31,310
And you have to live with this.

611
00:39:31,310 --> 00:39:33,570
Is that sometimes not all
the constants will work.

612
00:39:33,570 --> 00:39:36,270
Because there's more to
the problem than just

613
00:39:36,270 --> 00:39:37,880
the antidifferentiation.

614
00:39:37,880 --> 00:39:40,870
And here there are fewer answers
rather than more answers.

615
00:39:40,870 --> 00:39:43,110
In the other case we had
to add in some answers,

616
00:39:43,110 --> 00:39:45,030
here we have to take them away.

617
00:39:45,030 --> 00:39:46,890
Some of them don't
make any sense.

618
00:39:46,890 --> 00:39:48,644
And the only ones we
can get are the ones

619
00:39:48,644 --> 00:39:50,060
which are of this
form, where this

620
00:39:50,060 --> 00:39:53,804
is, say, some radius squared.

621
00:39:53,804 --> 00:39:55,470
Well maybe I shouldn't
call it a radius.

622
00:39:55,470 --> 00:39:58,800
I'll just call it
a parameter, a^2.

623
00:39:58,800 --> 00:40:05,940
And these are of
course ellipses.

624
00:40:05,940 --> 00:40:09,080
And you can see
that the ellipses,

625
00:40:09,080 --> 00:40:13,990
the length here is
the square root of 2a

626
00:40:13,990 --> 00:40:18,160
and the semi-axis,
vertical semi-axis, is a.

627
00:40:18,160 --> 00:40:20,110
So this is the kind of
ellipse that we've got.

628
00:40:20,110 --> 00:40:24,140
And I draw it on the
previous diagram,

629
00:40:24,140 --> 00:40:28,100
I think it's somewhat
suggestive here.

630
00:40:28,100 --> 00:40:30,280
There, ellipses
are kind of eggs.

631
00:40:30,280 --> 00:40:32,820
They're a little bit
longer than they are high.

632
00:40:32,820 --> 00:40:37,160
And they go like this.

633
00:40:37,160 --> 00:40:40,960
And if I drew them
pretty much right,

634
00:40:40,960 --> 00:40:43,230
they should be
making right angles.

635
00:40:43,230 --> 00:40:49,710
At all of these places.

636
00:40:49,710 --> 00:40:53,530
OK, last little bit here.

637
00:40:53,530 --> 00:40:57,930
Again, you've got to be very
careful with these solutions.

638
00:40:57,930 --> 00:41:06,760
And so there's a
warning here too.

639
00:41:06,760 --> 00:41:08,500
So let's take a
look at the-- This

640
00:41:08,500 --> 00:41:10,924
is the implicit solution
to the equation.

641
00:41:10,924 --> 00:41:13,090
And this is the one that
tells us what the shape is.

642
00:41:13,090 --> 00:41:16,350
But we can also have
the explicit solution.

643
00:41:16,350 --> 00:41:18,170
And if I solve for
the explicit solution,

644
00:41:18,170 --> 00:41:25,400
it's y is equal to either plus
square root of (a^2 - x^2 / 2),

645
00:41:25,400 --> 00:41:32,080
or y is equal to minus the
square root of (a^2 - x^2 / 2).

646
00:41:32,080 --> 00:41:39,770
These are the
explicit solutions.

647
00:41:39,770 --> 00:41:41,350
And now, we notice
something that we

648
00:41:41,350 --> 00:41:43,850
should have noticed before.

649
00:41:43,850 --> 00:41:50,490
Which is that an ellipse
is not a function.

650
00:41:50,490 --> 00:41:54,070
It's only the top
half, if you like,

651
00:41:54,070 --> 00:41:56,610
that's giving you a
solution to this equation.

652
00:41:56,610 --> 00:41:58,740
Or maybe the bottom
half that's giving it

653
00:41:58,740 --> 00:42:00,450
the solution to the equation.

654
00:42:00,450 --> 00:42:07,480
So the one over here, this
one is the top halves.

655
00:42:07,480 --> 00:42:15,270
And this one over here
is the bottom halves.

656
00:42:15,270 --> 00:42:18,570
And there's something
else that's interesting.

657
00:42:18,570 --> 00:42:28,560
Which is that we have a
problem at y = 0. y = 0

658
00:42:28,560 --> 00:42:33,550
is where x = square root of 2a.

659
00:42:33,550 --> 00:42:35,960
That's when we get
to this end here.

660
00:42:35,960 --> 00:42:38,800
And what happens is the solution
comes around and it stops.

661
00:42:38,800 --> 00:42:44,820
It has a vertical slope.

662
00:42:44,820 --> 00:42:48,910
Vertical slope.

663
00:42:48,910 --> 00:42:56,420
And the solution stops.

664
00:42:56,420 --> 00:43:00,020
But really, that's
not so unreasonable.

665
00:43:00,020 --> 00:43:01,890
After all, look at the formula.

666
00:43:01,890 --> 00:43:03,660
There was a y in the
denominator here.

667
00:43:03,660 --> 00:43:08,500
When y = 0, the slope
should be infinite.

668
00:43:08,500 --> 00:43:12,530
And so this equation
is just giving us

669
00:43:12,530 --> 00:43:14,490
what it geometrically
and intuitively

670
00:43:14,490 --> 00:43:15,800
should be giving us.

671
00:43:15,800 --> 00:43:22,790
At that stage.

672
00:43:22,790 --> 00:43:26,221
So that is the introduction
to ordinary differential

673
00:43:26,221 --> 00:43:26,720
equations.

674
00:43:26,720 --> 00:43:28,740
Again, there's
only one technique

675
00:43:28,740 --> 00:43:32,580
which is-- We're not done yet,
we have a whole four minutes

676
00:43:32,580 --> 00:43:34,030
left and we're going to review.

677
00:43:34,030 --> 00:43:39,220
Now, so fortunately, this
review is very short.

678
00:43:39,220 --> 00:43:42,170
Fortunately for you,
I handed out to you

679
00:43:42,170 --> 00:43:44,920
exactly what you're going
to be covering on the test.

680
00:43:44,920 --> 00:43:48,440
And it's what's printed
here but there's a whole two

681
00:43:48,440 --> 00:43:51,000
pages of discussion.

682
00:43:51,000 --> 00:43:59,500
And I want to give you very,
very clear-cut instructions

683
00:43:59,500 --> 00:44:00,000
here.

684
00:44:00,000 --> 00:44:04,780
This is usually the hardest
test of this course.

685
00:44:04,780 --> 00:44:07,170
People usually do
terribly on it.

686
00:44:07,170 --> 00:44:11,840
And I'm going to
try to stop that

687
00:44:11,840 --> 00:44:14,850
by making it a
little bit easier.

688
00:44:14,850 --> 00:44:17,620
And now here's what
we're going to do.

689
00:44:17,620 --> 00:44:21,150
I'm telling you exactly
what type of problems

690
00:44:21,150 --> 00:44:22,447
are going to be on the test.

691
00:44:22,447 --> 00:44:23,280
These are these six.

692
00:44:23,280 --> 00:44:25,940
It's also written on
your sheet, your handout.

693
00:44:25,940 --> 00:44:29,012
It's also just what was
asked on last year's test.

694
00:44:29,012 --> 00:44:31,220
You should go and you should
look at last year's test

695
00:44:31,220 --> 00:44:33,420
and see what types
of problems they are.

696
00:44:33,420 --> 00:44:36,210
I really, really, am going
to ask the same questions,

697
00:44:36,210 --> 00:44:38,900
or the same type of questions.

698
00:44:38,900 --> 00:44:41,860
Not the same questions.

699
00:44:41,860 --> 00:44:44,960
So that's what's going
to happen on the test.

700
00:44:44,960 --> 00:44:48,680
And let me just tell
you, say one thing, which

701
00:44:48,680 --> 00:44:51,210
is the main theme of the class.

702
00:44:51,210 --> 00:44:52,290
And I will open up.

703
00:44:52,290 --> 00:44:54,330
We'll have time for one
question after that.

704
00:44:54,330 --> 00:44:58,540
The main theme of this unit
is simply the following.

705
00:44:58,540 --> 00:45:05,460
That information about
derivative and sometimes

706
00:45:05,460 --> 00:45:11,010
maybe the second
derivative, tells us

707
00:45:11,010 --> 00:45:17,315
information about f itself.

708
00:45:17,315 --> 00:45:19,940
And that's just what were doing
here with ordinary differential

709
00:45:19,940 --> 00:45:20,490
equations.

710
00:45:20,490 --> 00:45:22,865
And that was what we were
doing way at the beginning when

711
00:45:22,865 --> 00:45:23,825
we did approximations.