1
00:00:00,070 --> 00:00:02,430
The following content is
provided under a Creative

2
00:00:02,430 --> 00:00:03,800
Commons license.

3
00:00:03,800 --> 00:00:06,050
Your support will help
MIT OpenCourseWare

4
00:00:06,050 --> 00:00:10,140
continue to offer high quality
educational resources for free.

5
00:00:10,140 --> 00:00:12,690
To make a donation or to
view additional materials

6
00:00:12,690 --> 00:00:16,580
from hundreds of MIT courses,
visit MIT OpenCourseWare

7
00:00:16,580 --> 00:00:17,260
at ocw.mit.edu.

8
00:00:37,410 --> 00:00:40,110
PROFESSOR: OK,
let's get started.

9
00:00:40,110 --> 00:00:42,260
Can we get them up?

10
00:00:42,260 --> 00:00:43,690
So this is our thing spinning.

11
00:00:43,690 --> 00:00:46,180
What are the units of
the generalized force

12
00:00:46,180 --> 00:00:48,060
in this problem, which
is going to be related

13
00:00:48,060 --> 00:00:50,130
to the torque at the bottom.

14
00:00:50,130 --> 00:00:54,000
So most people
said Newton meters,

15
00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:56,340
which is the units of torque.

16
00:00:56,340 --> 00:01:00,550
And that would be correct.

17
00:01:00,550 --> 00:01:03,290
So you're going to get
some i theta double dot

18
00:01:03,290 --> 00:01:05,940
kind of equation of
motion with this,

19
00:01:05,940 --> 00:01:08,380
as units of moment or torque.

20
00:01:08,380 --> 00:01:12,440
And any external
non-conservative force on it

21
00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:14,660
would in this case
have units of torque.

22
00:01:14,660 --> 00:01:17,440
OK, next.

23
00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:19,920
So we have a pendulum,
kind of an odd shape.

24
00:01:19,920 --> 00:01:21,590
That is, does it
have symmetries?

25
00:01:24,290 --> 00:01:27,665
Name a symmetry
that this thing has.

26
00:01:27,665 --> 00:01:29,640
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

27
00:01:29,640 --> 00:01:32,390
PROFESSOR: You mean axial
then, or a plane, or what?

28
00:01:32,390 --> 00:01:35,030
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

29
00:01:35,030 --> 00:01:36,850
PROFESSOR: Axis or a plane, OK.

30
00:01:36,850 --> 00:01:38,880
So this thing has symmetries.

31
00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:40,930
You could convince
yourself pretty quickly

32
00:01:40,930 --> 00:01:42,820
that the principal
axes with one big

33
00:01:42,820 --> 00:01:44,590
break down the center of it.

34
00:01:44,590 --> 00:01:47,650
And the other two would
be perpendicular to that.

35
00:01:47,650 --> 00:01:52,800
So is it appropriate to use the
parallel axis theorem to find

36
00:01:52,800 --> 00:01:57,150
an equation of motion of this
thing for when it's pinned

37
00:01:57,150 --> 00:01:58,470
at the top?

38
00:01:58,470 --> 00:02:01,790
And most people said
yes if you said no.

39
00:02:01,790 --> 00:02:03,380
I think parallel
axis theorem works

40
00:02:03,380 --> 00:02:05,440
just great in this problem.

41
00:02:05,440 --> 00:02:11,670
It's planar motion, and the,
for example, kinetic energy

42
00:02:11,670 --> 00:02:20,245
you can write as 1/2i about
o up there, the hinge point.

43
00:02:20,245 --> 00:02:24,160
i with respect to that
point theta double dot.

44
00:02:24,160 --> 00:02:26,220
And to do i about
that point, you'd

45
00:02:26,220 --> 00:02:27,740
use the parallel axis theorem.

46
00:02:27,740 --> 00:02:34,970
So i about g plus the
distance l squared times m.

47
00:02:34,970 --> 00:02:35,820
This one.

48
00:02:35,820 --> 00:02:39,300
Do you expect a centripetal
acceleration term

49
00:02:39,300 --> 00:02:42,730
to show up in your
equations of motion?

50
00:02:42,730 --> 00:02:45,175
And some said yes, some said no.

51
00:02:48,010 --> 00:02:50,010
So the equation of
motion for this,

52
00:02:50,010 --> 00:02:54,580
I would probably write
in terms of some rotation

53
00:02:54,580 --> 00:02:58,890
theta of the big disk.

54
00:02:58,890 --> 00:03:02,055
And that will cause the mass on
the string to move up and down.

55
00:03:05,280 --> 00:03:12,770
But for the rotating
parts of the system,

56
00:03:12,770 --> 00:03:20,810
are there-- I'll think of
a clear way to word this.

57
00:03:20,810 --> 00:03:25,630
Let's ignore the little mass
going up and down for a moment.

58
00:03:25,630 --> 00:03:29,370
The axis of rotation of
that double disk and hub

59
00:03:29,370 --> 00:03:32,270
and the bigger disk,
does the axis of rotation

60
00:03:32,270 --> 00:03:35,636
go through the center
of mass of that disk?

61
00:03:35,636 --> 00:03:36,552
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

62
00:03:36,552 --> 00:03:37,135
PROFESSOR: OK.

63
00:03:37,135 --> 00:03:39,713
Is it statically balanced?

64
00:03:47,220 --> 00:03:50,150
We haven't talked about
balancing in a while.

65
00:03:50,150 --> 00:03:52,940
Good review question for
thinking about a quiz

66
00:03:52,940 --> 00:03:55,260
next Tuesday.

67
00:03:55,260 --> 00:04:00,840
So what does it
take for something

68
00:04:00,840 --> 00:04:07,400
which is rotating to be
considered statically balanced?

69
00:04:07,400 --> 00:04:10,694
The axis of rotation must what?

70
00:04:10,694 --> 00:04:11,630
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

71
00:04:11,630 --> 00:04:13,754
PROFESSOR: He says pass
through the center of mass.

72
00:04:13,754 --> 00:04:16,910
Anybody else have a suggestion,
different suggestion?

73
00:04:16,910 --> 00:04:21,370
If the axis of rotation passes
through the center of mass,

74
00:04:21,370 --> 00:04:24,105
is it statically balanced?

75
00:04:24,105 --> 00:04:27,210
AUDIENCE: It has to
be a principal axis?

76
00:04:27,210 --> 00:04:29,210
PROFESSOR: Does it have
to be a principal axis?

77
00:04:29,210 --> 00:04:30,850
What do you think?

78
00:04:30,850 --> 00:04:33,600
Is that axis passing through
g have to be a principal

79
00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:36,945
axis in order for it to
be statically balanced?

80
00:04:42,200 --> 00:04:42,865
Let's see.

81
00:04:49,270 --> 00:04:53,680
I don't have a little--
no, it's too big.

82
00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:01,780
This is just a wheel.

83
00:05:01,780 --> 00:05:05,270
And this is my axle going
through the center of mass.

84
00:05:05,270 --> 00:05:07,400
And it goes through
the center of mass,

85
00:05:07,400 --> 00:05:15,650
and it'll have no tendency
to swing down to a low point

86
00:05:15,650 --> 00:05:19,710
because the weight, its
weight, is acting right

87
00:05:19,710 --> 00:05:20,820
on its center of mass.

88
00:05:20,820 --> 00:05:23,885
And with respect to this
axle, there's no moment arm.

89
00:05:23,885 --> 00:05:25,740
So there's no torque
caused by gravity

90
00:05:25,740 --> 00:05:31,320
that could cause this to put its
center of mass below the axle.

91
00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:33,380
So it doesn't
matter, even if I had

92
00:05:33,380 --> 00:05:35,830
the axis going through here.

93
00:05:35,830 --> 00:05:39,850
As long as that axis
passes through g,

94
00:05:39,850 --> 00:05:42,750
there is no tendency for this
thing to swing to a low side

95
00:05:42,750 --> 00:05:47,630
because the mass mg is
acting right on the axle.

96
00:05:47,630 --> 00:05:48,690
No moment arm.

97
00:05:48,690 --> 00:05:53,660
So the only condition
for static balance

98
00:05:53,660 --> 00:05:56,820
for a rotor of any kind,
something rotating,

99
00:05:56,820 --> 00:06:00,320
to be statically balanced
is for the axis of rotation

100
00:06:00,320 --> 00:06:01,680
to pass through the mass center.

101
00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:11,060
So the rotating part of this
system, the axis of rotation

102
00:06:11,060 --> 00:06:15,770
passes through the mass
center, that big disk.

103
00:06:15,770 --> 00:06:18,875
Does the little mass, m, rotate?

104
00:06:22,420 --> 00:06:28,450
So it can't be statically
or dynamically in balance.

105
00:06:28,450 --> 00:06:30,390
It's not a rotating system.

106
00:06:30,390 --> 00:06:32,570
It's just a little
translating mass

107
00:06:32,570 --> 00:06:34,540
that happens to be
pulled up and down

108
00:06:34,540 --> 00:06:36,770
by the action of this thing.

109
00:06:36,770 --> 00:06:39,610
So the question
was, do you expect

110
00:06:39,610 --> 00:06:42,040
a centripetal acceleration
term to show up?

111
00:06:42,040 --> 00:06:43,720
The answer's no.

112
00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:44,840
So let's get back to that.

113
00:06:44,840 --> 00:06:48,730
If you have a static imbalance--
let's say my axis of rotation

114
00:06:48,730 --> 00:06:51,570
is here.

115
00:06:51,570 --> 00:06:54,190
This is definitely
statically imbalanced now.

116
00:06:54,190 --> 00:06:57,640
Its mass center is down here.

117
00:06:57,640 --> 00:07:02,080
The force of gravity pulls it
down until it hangs straight.

118
00:07:02,080 --> 00:07:04,520
That's how you can just test
to see if you're passing

119
00:07:04,520 --> 00:07:06,280
through the mass center.

120
00:07:06,280 --> 00:07:12,980
So if you have an axis that
does not pass through g,

121
00:07:12,980 --> 00:07:14,760
then you're
statically imbalanced.

122
00:07:14,760 --> 00:07:18,700
And if you rotate
about that axis,

123
00:07:18,700 --> 00:07:25,250
is there a net centripetal force
required as it goes around?

124
00:07:25,250 --> 00:07:26,510
Why?

125
00:07:26,510 --> 00:07:28,810
AUDIENCE: Because the center
of mass is on the outside.

126
00:07:28,810 --> 00:07:31,620
PROFESSOR: So the center of
mass is some distance away.

127
00:07:31,620 --> 00:07:33,820
And you're swinging
it around and around

128
00:07:33,820 --> 00:07:37,150
and make that center
of mass go in a circle.

129
00:07:37,150 --> 00:07:39,809
You're applying a
centripetal acceleration

130
00:07:39,809 --> 00:07:41,350
to the center of
mass, and that takes

131
00:07:41,350 --> 00:07:45,330
a force, which you sometimes
think of as a centrifugal force

132
00:07:45,330 --> 00:07:45,887
pulling out.

133
00:07:45,887 --> 00:07:47,720
That's what you're going
to have to pull in,

134
00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:51,800
some m r omega squared.

135
00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:55,710
So no centripetal term would
be expected in this problem.

136
00:07:55,710 --> 00:07:57,420
Let's go to the next one.

137
00:07:57,420 --> 00:07:59,500
This one, you had two
different conditions.

138
00:07:59,500 --> 00:08:03,740
Either rolling without
slip or rolling with slip.

139
00:08:03,740 --> 00:08:08,030
And the question is,
for which conditions

140
00:08:08,030 --> 00:08:10,290
are the generalized
forces associated

141
00:08:10,290 --> 00:08:13,730
with a virtual displacement
of delta theta,

142
00:08:13,730 --> 00:08:18,560
the rotation of the
wheel, equal to zero?

143
00:08:18,560 --> 00:08:20,200
So remember,
generalized forces are

144
00:08:20,200 --> 00:08:23,820
the forces that account for
the non-conservative forces

145
00:08:23,820 --> 00:08:25,350
in the problem.

146
00:08:25,350 --> 00:08:30,070
So if it's rolling down
the hill without slip,

147
00:08:30,070 --> 00:08:35,900
are there any non-conservative
forces acting on it?

148
00:08:35,900 --> 00:08:38,710
Is there a friction
force acting on it?

149
00:08:38,710 --> 00:08:40,360
Yeah, but does it do any work?

150
00:08:40,360 --> 00:08:44,019
No, because there's no delta
r at the point of application

151
00:08:44,019 --> 00:08:44,560
of the force.

152
00:08:44,560 --> 00:08:46,300
There's no motion.

153
00:08:46,300 --> 00:08:50,650
So for which condition
does the generalized forces

154
00:08:50,650 --> 00:08:51,300
equal to zero?

155
00:08:51,300 --> 00:08:53,960
Certainly for the condition
when it does not slip.

156
00:08:53,960 --> 00:08:57,740
What about if it does slip?

157
00:08:57,740 --> 00:09:00,480
Would you expect a
non-conservative force

158
00:09:00,480 --> 00:09:01,590
to do work on it?

159
00:09:01,590 --> 00:09:04,660
What force would that be?

160
00:09:04,660 --> 00:09:05,800
The friction force.

161
00:09:05,800 --> 00:09:11,630
So now, as the wheel turns, that
point of application where it's

162
00:09:11,630 --> 00:09:17,020
sliding, you're actually getting
a little delta omega, delta

163
00:09:17,020 --> 00:09:18,260
theta rather.

164
00:09:18,260 --> 00:09:22,540
You move a little
distance r delta theta,

165
00:09:22,540 --> 00:09:24,140
dotted with the force.

166
00:09:24,140 --> 00:09:27,620
You get a certain little
bit of virtual work

167
00:09:27,620 --> 00:09:31,560
done, r delta theta times f.

168
00:09:31,560 --> 00:09:36,370
So the only case a is
where you get zero.

169
00:09:36,370 --> 00:09:37,215
Oh, this one.

170
00:09:41,070 --> 00:09:44,970
What's the generalized
force associated with f?

171
00:09:44,970 --> 00:09:46,500
That's this applied force.

172
00:09:46,500 --> 00:09:50,320
It's applied to the rolling
thing going down the hill.

173
00:09:50,320 --> 00:09:53,110
The force is horizontal.

174
00:09:53,110 --> 00:09:56,730
And you're asked what's the
generalized force associated

175
00:09:56,730 --> 00:10:01,760
with f due to the virtual
displacement delta x?

176
00:10:01,760 --> 00:10:07,980
And x is the motion
of the main cart.

177
00:10:07,980 --> 00:10:11,130
So when you're doing
generalized forces,

178
00:10:11,130 --> 00:10:14,230
you think in terms
of virtual work.

179
00:10:14,230 --> 00:10:17,650
Can you imagine that that
cart's moving a little distance

180
00:10:17,650 --> 00:10:23,100
delta x, the main x
in the xyo system?

181
00:10:23,100 --> 00:10:26,560
It shifts a little
distance delta x.

182
00:10:26,560 --> 00:10:29,360
That force, does it
move-- does the point

183
00:10:29,360 --> 00:10:33,910
of application of that force
move with that delta x?

184
00:10:33,910 --> 00:10:36,092
That's really what the
question comes down to.

185
00:10:44,290 --> 00:10:44,895
This one.

186
00:11:01,380 --> 00:11:04,310
So this is your inertial
system, and it's

187
00:11:04,310 --> 00:11:06,700
going to account for the
motion of this object.

188
00:11:09,900 --> 00:11:15,300
And then up here,
got your wheel.

189
00:11:15,300 --> 00:11:23,680
And we have some coordinate
system attached to this object,

190
00:11:23,680 --> 00:11:27,470
noting the position
of the wheel as it

191
00:11:27,470 --> 00:11:29,860
goes up and down the hill.

192
00:11:29,860 --> 00:11:34,380
So this coordinate's
relative to the moving cart.

193
00:11:34,380 --> 00:11:37,240
This coordinate's inertial.

194
00:11:37,240 --> 00:11:43,580
The question's only asking then,
what is the virtual work done

195
00:11:43,580 --> 00:11:49,440
that's associated width delta x
here, some motion of the cart.

196
00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:55,960
And it's going to be what we're
looking for, the Qx delta x.

197
00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:59,427
And when we say, OK.

198
00:11:59,427 --> 00:12:01,135
At the point of
application of the force,

199
00:12:01,135 --> 00:12:04,170
there's literally F here.

200
00:12:04,170 --> 00:12:06,490
And it's in the horizontal
direction, which is exactly

201
00:12:06,490 --> 00:12:15,060
the same direction as capital X.
So this is equal to the force.

202
00:12:15,060 --> 00:12:19,280
And in the problem it's
called-- this is just

203
00:12:19,280 --> 00:12:22,105
called F. It's a vector.

204
00:12:24,850 --> 00:12:28,310
And we're trying to
deduce the deflection

205
00:12:28,310 --> 00:12:30,140
at the point of application.

206
00:12:30,140 --> 00:12:34,460
I'm going to call it some--
it can be many forces.

207
00:12:34,460 --> 00:12:36,350
I'm going to call it
F sub i so that we

208
00:12:36,350 --> 00:12:39,580
think of it as one of many.

209
00:12:39,580 --> 00:12:57,260
Times the displacement
delta ri due to delta x.

210
00:12:57,260 --> 00:12:58,740
So this is a vector.

211
00:12:58,740 --> 00:13:00,100
This is a displacement.

212
00:13:00,100 --> 00:13:01,580
This is a force.

213
00:13:01,580 --> 00:13:04,390
The amount of work done
as this force moves

214
00:13:04,390 --> 00:13:09,040
through that
displacement is some F

215
00:13:09,040 --> 00:13:14,300
dot delta r, the movement
at this point i where it's

216
00:13:14,300 --> 00:13:19,490
applied, due to this motion.

217
00:13:19,490 --> 00:13:24,450
So what is the delta r at
this point due to that motion?

218
00:13:29,250 --> 00:13:31,720
So another concept here,
when you're doing this,

219
00:13:31,720 --> 00:13:34,700
you think of these
mentally one at a time.

220
00:13:34,700 --> 00:13:37,120
How many degrees of freedom
do we have in this problem?

221
00:13:40,890 --> 00:13:43,190
Takes two to completely
describe the motion.

222
00:13:43,190 --> 00:13:46,230
x and this one
attached to the cart.

223
00:13:49,050 --> 00:13:51,750
And you think of
these one at a time.

224
00:13:51,750 --> 00:13:53,370
So right now,
we're asking what's

225
00:13:53,370 --> 00:13:59,060
the virtual work done by that
force due to movement of this

226
00:13:59,060 --> 00:14:02,870
coordinate only, assuming
this one is frozen?

227
00:14:02,870 --> 00:14:05,680
So this one is not
allowed to move.

228
00:14:05,680 --> 00:14:07,180
So if this is not
allowed to move,

229
00:14:07,180 --> 00:14:12,020
does the position of this change
relative to this cart as you

230
00:14:12,020 --> 00:14:12,907
move the cart?

231
00:14:15,530 --> 00:14:16,360
No.

232
00:14:16,360 --> 00:14:17,910
That one is held fixed.

233
00:14:17,910 --> 00:14:19,950
It moves with the cart.

234
00:14:19,950 --> 00:14:23,760
So if you move the cart
a little distance here,

235
00:14:23,760 --> 00:14:29,060
delta x in this
frame, then this wheel

236
00:14:29,060 --> 00:14:31,810
moves with the
cart that distance.

237
00:14:31,810 --> 00:14:35,500
So how much work gets done?

238
00:14:35,500 --> 00:14:44,430
So this delta ri in this
case is equal to delta x.

239
00:14:44,430 --> 00:14:46,860
And the amount of
work that gets done

240
00:14:46,860 --> 00:15:00,610
is delta w at point i due to
delta x here is F dot delta x,

241
00:15:00,610 --> 00:15:04,170
but F is in the
capital I direction.

242
00:15:04,170 --> 00:15:06,770
This is in the
capital I direction.

243
00:15:06,770 --> 00:15:10,580
So it's just F delta x.

244
00:15:10,580 --> 00:15:11,930
is the work done.

245
00:15:11,930 --> 00:15:14,760
And that's Qx delta x.

246
00:15:14,760 --> 00:15:23,580
So the generalized
force is just F.

247
00:15:23,580 --> 00:15:24,500
All right.

248
00:15:24,500 --> 00:15:25,310
What else we got?

249
00:15:28,040 --> 00:15:29,106
OK, wait a minute.

250
00:15:32,509 --> 00:15:33,800
Oh, this is due to the dashpot.

251
00:15:36,420 --> 00:15:38,010
What is generalized
force associated

252
00:15:38,010 --> 00:15:42,670
with the dashpot due to
a virtual deflection x1?

253
00:15:42,670 --> 00:15:45,640
Now x1's the
coordinate, that thing

254
00:15:45,640 --> 00:15:46,850
rolling up and down the hill.

255
00:15:49,490 --> 00:15:52,725
So now the same thing,
the dashpot force.

256
00:16:02,460 --> 00:16:05,142
Here's your cart.

257
00:16:05,142 --> 00:16:05,975
Here's your dashpot.

258
00:16:16,960 --> 00:16:20,190
And a free body
diagram of the cart

259
00:16:20,190 --> 00:16:25,740
would show a dashpot force
here, bx dot in that direction.

260
00:16:29,170 --> 00:16:37,890
And if we move the cart,
again, a little bit delta

261
00:16:37,890 --> 00:16:40,655
x, how much work gets done?

262
00:16:40,655 --> 00:16:42,930
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

263
00:16:42,930 --> 00:16:45,790
PROFESSOR: This is not the
question asked up there.

264
00:16:45,790 --> 00:16:47,530
Just first this.

265
00:16:47,530 --> 00:16:52,370
How much virtual work gets done
by that in a deflection delta

266
00:16:52,370 --> 00:16:54,180
x?

267
00:16:54,180 --> 00:17:01,800
Well, it's some Fi dot delta
r due to delta x, which

268
00:17:01,800 --> 00:17:03,760
is just delta x.

269
00:17:03,760 --> 00:17:09,349
So this is some minus bx dot
in the I direction times delta

270
00:17:09,349 --> 00:17:10,900
x in the I again.

271
00:17:10,900 --> 00:17:13,609
It's just in this
case it's minus.

272
00:17:13,609 --> 00:17:28,669
So this virtual work done this
time due to just the dashpot.

273
00:17:28,669 --> 00:17:29,960
I don't know how to write that.

274
00:17:29,960 --> 00:17:31,250
I don't have a subscript.

275
00:17:31,250 --> 00:17:35,590
So this dashpot
only here, bx dot,

276
00:17:35,590 --> 00:17:40,020
is bx dot minus in
the I direction--

277
00:17:40,020 --> 00:17:46,270
that's the force-- dotted
with the dr that it moves.

278
00:17:48,910 --> 00:17:51,870
And the dr that it
moves is just delta x.

279
00:17:51,870 --> 00:18:00,120
So this would be minus
bx I dot delta x I is

280
00:18:00,120 --> 00:18:02,280
your virtual work that's done.

281
00:18:02,280 --> 00:18:08,750
And this is equal to Qx delta x.

282
00:18:08,750 --> 00:18:14,270
But this is a part of Qx
due only to the dashpot.

283
00:18:14,270 --> 00:18:20,530
And you get minus
bx dot delta x.

284
00:18:20,530 --> 00:18:26,990
So now we've gotten both parts
of the total generalized force

285
00:18:26,990 --> 00:18:32,375
associated with the motion
delta x is F minus bx dot.

286
00:18:39,550 --> 00:18:44,960
In general, this
expression Qx delta x

287
00:18:44,960 --> 00:18:49,740
is the summation over
all of the applied forces

288
00:18:49,740 --> 00:19:02,640
i dot delta r at i
due to, in this case,

289
00:19:02,640 --> 00:19:07,050
the motion in the x direction.

290
00:19:07,050 --> 00:19:10,150
And we have two
contributions here.

291
00:19:10,150 --> 00:19:14,190
They come from the
applied force F and this.

292
00:19:14,190 --> 00:19:16,990
So Qx in this problem
is going to turn out

293
00:19:16,990 --> 00:19:22,554
to be F minus bx dot.

294
00:19:22,554 --> 00:19:23,970
Now, what about
the other-- what's

295
00:19:23,970 --> 00:19:25,720
really asked in this
problem is how much--

296
00:19:25,720 --> 00:19:29,070
what's the generalized force
associated with the motion

297
00:19:29,070 --> 00:19:32,330
of the wheel down the hill?

298
00:19:32,330 --> 00:19:34,270
This is in the x1 direction.

299
00:19:34,270 --> 00:19:37,770
So now you have a little
virtual deflection delta x1.

300
00:19:41,830 --> 00:19:46,580
How much virtual work
gets done by the dashpot?

301
00:19:46,580 --> 00:19:47,480
AUDIENCE: Zero.

302
00:19:47,480 --> 00:19:48,438
PROFESSOR: I hear zero.

303
00:19:50,780 --> 00:19:54,800
So a little virtual
displacement of delta x1,

304
00:19:54,800 --> 00:19:58,190
does it move the main cart?

305
00:19:58,190 --> 00:20:00,750
That's really what's
going on here.

306
00:20:00,750 --> 00:20:05,360
Does the main cart move because
the wheel and the main cart

307
00:20:05,360 --> 00:20:07,615
change relative
position a little bit?

308
00:20:11,054 --> 00:20:11,597
AUDIENCE: No.

309
00:20:11,597 --> 00:20:12,180
PROFESSOR: No.

310
00:20:12,180 --> 00:20:13,180
I hear no here.

311
00:20:13,180 --> 00:20:16,000
I mean, that's the--
the coordinate x1

312
00:20:16,000 --> 00:20:20,620
is the relative motion between
the cart and the wheel.

313
00:20:20,620 --> 00:20:23,840
And it's independent of the
motion of the cart with respect

314
00:20:23,840 --> 00:20:27,130
to the inertial frame.

315
00:20:27,130 --> 00:20:29,520
So any motion of
the little wheel

316
00:20:29,520 --> 00:20:31,405
does not affect the main cart.

317
00:20:35,030 --> 00:20:38,200
So there's no virtual
work done by that dashpot

318
00:20:38,200 --> 00:20:40,901
because the wheel moves
up and down the hill.

319
00:20:40,901 --> 00:20:42,650
And it makes sense,
physical sense, right?

320
00:20:42,650 --> 00:20:44,650
The wheel can sit and roll up
and down the hill all day long.

321
00:20:44,650 --> 00:20:46,150
It's not going to
move that dashpot.

322
00:20:49,310 --> 00:20:51,180
Next.

323
00:20:51,180 --> 00:20:53,110
This problem.

324
00:20:53,110 --> 00:20:56,471
I just realized this problem's
harder than I thought it was.

325
00:20:56,471 --> 00:20:59,484
It's one of those things
that you look at it,

326
00:20:59,484 --> 00:21:00,775
oh, that looks straightforward.

327
00:21:00,775 --> 00:21:02,630
Then I looked at
Audrey's solution

328
00:21:02,630 --> 00:21:05,030
and said, oh, she did it right.

329
00:21:05,030 --> 00:21:08,140
And this is a little trickier
than you might think.

330
00:21:08,140 --> 00:21:12,330
So are the Axyz axes,
which rotate with the hub--

331
00:21:12,330 --> 00:21:15,500
so there's a rotating
there-- definitely

332
00:21:15,500 --> 00:21:19,010
principal coordinates
of that rod?

333
00:21:19,010 --> 00:21:19,970
That's not a problem.

334
00:21:19,970 --> 00:21:21,730
But are they
principal coordinates

335
00:21:21,730 --> 00:21:24,040
for that disk out on the end?

336
00:21:26,986 --> 00:21:28,361
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

337
00:21:28,361 --> 00:21:29,110
PROFESSOR: Pardon?

338
00:21:29,110 --> 00:21:31,090
AUDIENCE: Depends if
it's slipping or not.

339
00:21:31,090 --> 00:21:32,256
PROFESSOR: Depends if it's--

340
00:21:32,256 --> 00:21:34,260
AUDIENCE: Slipping or not.

341
00:21:34,260 --> 00:21:38,275
PROFESSOR: Actually,
I don't think so.

342
00:21:42,370 --> 00:21:44,370
Let's just talk about--
principal coordinates

343
00:21:44,370 --> 00:21:47,000
need to be attached
to the body, right?

344
00:21:47,000 --> 00:21:51,890
So problems like this do--
let's say we're using Lagrange,

345
00:21:51,890 --> 00:21:54,930
and we want to calculate
the total kinetic-- you

346
00:21:54,930 --> 00:21:58,030
need to calculate the total
kinetic energy of the system.

347
00:21:58,030 --> 00:22:02,190
So how would you go about
breaking this thing down

348
00:22:02,190 --> 00:22:04,610
to compute the total
kinetic energy?

349
00:22:04,610 --> 00:22:09,420
Would you break it into
more than one part?

350
00:22:09,420 --> 00:22:12,259
What would be the natural
things to break it into?

351
00:22:12,259 --> 00:22:13,550
AUDIENCE: The disk and the rod.

352
00:22:13,550 --> 00:22:15,174
PROFESSOR: The disk
and the rod, right?

353
00:22:15,174 --> 00:22:19,090
So the kinetic energy
of the rod, that's

354
00:22:19,090 --> 00:22:20,090
pretty straightforward.

355
00:22:20,090 --> 00:22:28,040
It's 1/2i with respect to the
center, theta dot squared,

356
00:22:28,040 --> 00:22:29,380
omega squared.

357
00:22:29,380 --> 00:22:32,830
But the kinetic energy
of that disk out

358
00:22:32,830 --> 00:22:41,920
there, you need to account for
its rotation and its movement

359
00:22:41,920 --> 00:22:45,760
of its center of
mass in the circle.

360
00:22:45,760 --> 00:22:53,160
So let's-- I'm winging it now,
so bear with me if I make any

361
00:22:53,160 --> 00:22:53,720
mistakes.

362
00:22:53,720 --> 00:22:54,640
You can help me out.

363
00:22:57,780 --> 00:23:03,740
T rod would be-- and
our coordinate system

364
00:23:03,740 --> 00:23:06,810
is an A at the center.

365
00:23:09,570 --> 00:23:15,330
There actually isn't a--
oh yeah, there's the A.

366
00:23:15,330 --> 00:23:17,310
So T of the rod,
I would argue, is

367
00:23:17,310 --> 00:23:36,040
1/2M of the rod omega
squared ML squared over 3.

368
00:23:36,040 --> 00:23:38,160
Because it's rotating
about one end.

369
00:23:38,160 --> 00:23:40,490
So apply the parallel
axis theorem.

370
00:23:40,490 --> 00:23:44,630
The kinetic energy
of the rod is 1/2M i

371
00:23:44,630 --> 00:23:49,220
with respect to that
central axis, omega squared.

372
00:23:49,220 --> 00:23:52,880
And so that gets you
from ML squared over 12

373
00:23:52,880 --> 00:23:56,830
to ML squared over 3 because
you're swinging around one end.

374
00:23:56,830 --> 00:23:59,240
But now we need T of the disk.

375
00:24:01,950 --> 00:24:04,160
And to do T of the
disk, I would do it

376
00:24:04,160 --> 00:24:12,870
by saying 1/2M of the disk
velocity of this center of mass

377
00:24:12,870 --> 00:24:19,220
of the disk in o
dot VGo-- so that

378
00:24:19,220 --> 00:24:24,830
takes care of its kinetic
energy due to motion

379
00:24:24,830 --> 00:24:43,170
of its center of mass-- plus 1/2
omega dot H with respect to G.

380
00:24:43,170 --> 00:24:45,990
With respect to
G, can you express

381
00:24:45,990 --> 00:24:50,870
H for the disk in terms of
a mass moment of inertia

382
00:24:50,870 --> 00:24:53,487
and some rotations,
rotation rates?

383
00:24:53,487 --> 00:24:54,195
Is it legitimate?

384
00:25:04,380 --> 00:25:08,440
Remember, I started-- a few
days ago, I started the top

385
00:25:08,440 --> 00:25:12,530
and said, here's the general
expression for kinetic energy.

386
00:25:12,530 --> 00:25:14,170
Full 3D, right?

387
00:25:14,170 --> 00:25:20,550
And it basically
was that expression.

388
00:25:20,550 --> 00:25:23,380
That works full 3D.

389
00:25:23,380 --> 00:25:28,220
And then when you fix a
point about which something

390
00:25:28,220 --> 00:25:33,760
is rotating, a rigid body,
then you can simplify it.

391
00:25:33,760 --> 00:25:38,070
But in this case, H, you could
represent the angular momentum

392
00:25:38,070 --> 00:25:42,600
around G as some I omega.

393
00:25:42,600 --> 00:25:46,920
And then you have to multiply
it by-- so this inside of here

394
00:25:46,920 --> 00:25:51,830
will be-- you can
represent this in here

395
00:25:51,830 --> 00:25:57,650
as some I omega
dotted with omega,

396
00:25:57,650 --> 00:26:00,030
and you will get
the kinetic energy

397
00:26:00,030 --> 00:26:02,350
due to the rotation of the disk.

398
00:26:02,350 --> 00:26:05,160
What makes this problem a
little trickier than I thought--

399
00:26:05,160 --> 00:26:06,740
I wasn't thinking
really clearly--

400
00:26:06,740 --> 00:26:12,520
is that omega is in-- what
frame do you express omega

401
00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:17,000
in when you're
computing H in terms

402
00:26:17,000 --> 00:26:18,320
of mass moments of inertia?

403
00:26:20,930 --> 00:26:25,580
In order to compute I, you have
to use what coordinate system?

404
00:26:25,580 --> 00:26:26,550
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

405
00:26:26,550 --> 00:26:27,980
PROFESSOR: Body fixed.

406
00:26:27,980 --> 00:26:31,610
And when you compute I
omega, what's the omega?

407
00:26:31,610 --> 00:26:35,394
What unit vectors is
the omega expressed in?

408
00:26:35,394 --> 00:26:37,814
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

409
00:26:37,814 --> 00:26:40,240
It's rotating, but
it's [INAUDIBLE].

410
00:26:40,240 --> 00:26:42,560
PROFESSOR: But in what--
so the unit vector's

411
00:26:42,560 --> 00:26:45,330
associated with what coordinate
system are the ones that you

412
00:26:45,330 --> 00:26:47,458
use to define omega?

413
00:26:47,458 --> 00:26:48,880
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

414
00:26:48,880 --> 00:26:52,110
PROFESSOR: The one attached
to the body or not?

415
00:26:52,110 --> 00:26:54,940
Generally in terms of the
one attached to the body.

416
00:26:54,940 --> 00:26:58,035
And the disk gets-- that
means they're rotating.

417
00:26:58,035 --> 00:26:59,400
It gets a little messy.

418
00:26:59,400 --> 00:27:00,860
So I'm not going
to do it because I

419
00:27:00,860 --> 00:27:02,930
can't do it in my head.

420
00:27:02,930 --> 00:27:07,780
So this one you need to do
the kinetic energy of that.

421
00:27:07,780 --> 00:27:09,950
You need to use this approach.

422
00:27:09,950 --> 00:27:15,020
And you have to be
careful with those.

423
00:27:15,020 --> 00:27:17,520
Food for thought at office
hours and in recitation.

424
00:27:20,910 --> 00:27:21,445
All right.

425
00:27:31,160 --> 00:27:35,480
I had meant to start
today-- we're well in,

426
00:27:35,480 --> 00:27:40,297
and I haven't even started where
I was going to really go today.

427
00:27:40,297 --> 00:27:41,630
So I have kind of a broken play.

428
00:27:41,630 --> 00:27:43,030
I have to decide what to drop.

429
00:27:43,030 --> 00:27:43,755
Give me a moment.

430
00:28:30,520 --> 00:28:33,790
So the principal thing I
wanted to talk about today

431
00:28:33,790 --> 00:28:38,210
was to dig a little deeper into
finding generalized forces.

432
00:28:38,210 --> 00:28:40,830
And the way we've
been doing it is

433
00:28:40,830 --> 00:28:42,840
what I would call kind
of an intuitive approach.

434
00:28:47,910 --> 00:28:52,270
So let's imagine we've
got a rigid body.

435
00:28:59,570 --> 00:29:03,356
And I have some forces
acting on it, F1.

436
00:29:18,180 --> 00:29:21,780
And at the point of application
of each of these forces,

437
00:29:21,780 --> 00:29:24,050
I can have a position
vector that goes there.

438
00:29:24,050 --> 00:29:31,580
So there's R1, R2, R3.

439
00:29:34,910 --> 00:29:37,990
And they're all with
respect to my o frame here,

440
00:29:37,990 --> 00:29:40,700
but I'm going to not
write in all the o's.

441
00:29:51,960 --> 00:29:56,890
Let's say that this is
a body in planar motion.

442
00:29:56,890 --> 00:29:58,300
So it's confined to a plane.

443
00:29:58,300 --> 00:29:59,280
It's a rigid body.

444
00:29:59,280 --> 00:30:01,380
It's like my disk there.

445
00:30:01,380 --> 00:30:03,940
So how many degrees
of freedom at most

446
00:30:03,940 --> 00:30:07,700
would it have if
there's no constraints?

447
00:30:07,700 --> 00:30:08,570
Three, right?

448
00:30:08,570 --> 00:30:12,480
It could move in the x, in the
y, and it can rotate in the z.

449
00:30:12,480 --> 00:30:14,570
So potentially three
degrees of freedom.

450
00:30:14,570 --> 00:30:20,770
So it'll take, let's
say, G is maybe here.

451
00:30:20,770 --> 00:30:30,910
So we need three
generalized coordinates.

452
00:30:30,910 --> 00:30:36,260
And they would be, say, x, y,
and some rotation of theta.

453
00:30:40,860 --> 00:30:48,360
And with them, we have
virtual displacements delta

454
00:30:48,360 --> 00:30:53,530
x, delta y, and delta theta.

455
00:30:53,530 --> 00:30:56,150
And we use those to
figure out the amount

456
00:30:56,150 --> 00:31:00,450
of non-conservative
work that happens

457
00:31:00,450 --> 00:31:03,255
when you make those little
small motions occur.

458
00:31:05,980 --> 00:31:16,230
And we're trying to find--
we need to find Qx, Qy, and Q

459
00:31:16,230 --> 00:31:19,910
theta, the generalized
forces associated

460
00:31:19,910 --> 00:31:24,631
with these small variations,
virtual reflections in R3

461
00:31:24,631 --> 00:31:25,130
coordinates.

462
00:31:33,310 --> 00:31:34,810
So the jth one.

463
00:31:34,810 --> 00:31:36,430
I have a bunch of
forces maybe up

464
00:31:36,430 --> 00:31:40,760
to here, someone
here that's some Fj.

465
00:31:40,760 --> 00:31:47,430
So the generalized
force-- I don't mean that.

466
00:31:47,430 --> 00:31:50,470
These are Fi's.

467
00:31:50,470 --> 00:31:55,420
The j's referred to are
generalized coordinates.

468
00:31:55,420 --> 00:32:05,505
So generalized
force Qj delta qj.

469
00:32:12,760 --> 00:32:19,170
This is the little bit of work
done in the virtual deflection

470
00:32:19,170 --> 00:32:21,500
delta qj.

471
00:32:21,500 --> 00:32:27,630
And there's work done by
all of these applied forces

472
00:32:27,630 --> 00:32:29,630
in the system, possibly.

473
00:32:29,630 --> 00:32:33,960
Every one, if I cause there a
little delta x of this body,

474
00:32:33,960 --> 00:32:39,240
it moves over an amount delta x.

475
00:32:39,240 --> 00:32:41,840
All of those points of
application of those forces

476
00:32:41,840 --> 00:32:44,320
move a little bit.

477
00:32:44,320 --> 00:32:49,290
And therefore, at every location
a little bit of work gets done.

478
00:32:49,290 --> 00:32:52,360
So in order to account
for all of the work,

479
00:32:52,360 --> 00:33:05,050
I have to do a summation
of the Fi dot delta r at i.

480
00:33:05,050 --> 00:33:14,020
And now this is associated
with the virtual displacement

481
00:33:14,020 --> 00:33:18,030
of generalized coordinate j.

482
00:33:18,030 --> 00:33:24,290
So the total virtual work
done by a displacement

483
00:33:24,290 --> 00:33:30,090
of one of these is a summation
of all the little bits of work

484
00:33:30,090 --> 00:33:34,660
done at all the points
of application of forces

485
00:33:34,660 --> 00:33:37,190
dotted with the
amount that the point

486
00:33:37,190 --> 00:33:42,740
of application of that force
moves caused by delta qj.

487
00:33:42,740 --> 00:33:48,320
So in general, that's what
the total qj would be.

488
00:33:48,320 --> 00:33:53,070
Now, we've done problems like
that more or less intuitively.

489
00:33:53,070 --> 00:33:55,356
We figured it out and said,
OK, if it moves this much,

490
00:33:55,356 --> 00:33:56,980
then it's going to
move over that much.

491
00:33:56,980 --> 00:34:00,050
And if there is an angle between
them, we take the component,

492
00:34:00,050 --> 00:34:01,350
and we just figure it out.

493
00:34:01,350 --> 00:34:06,164
Is there a more mathematical
way of doing this?

494
00:34:06,164 --> 00:34:07,580
And so I'm going
to show you that.

495
00:34:12,070 --> 00:34:19,880
So we've been doing this kind
of the intuitive approach here,

496
00:34:19,880 --> 00:34:23,690
the reasoning out each of the
deflections and calculating

497
00:34:23,690 --> 00:34:26,010
the result. That there's
a kinematic-- there's

498
00:34:26,010 --> 00:34:27,874
an explicit kinematic
way of doing this.

499
00:34:27,874 --> 00:34:29,040
AUDIENCE: I have a question.

500
00:34:29,040 --> 00:34:29,706
PROFESSOR: Yeah.

501
00:34:29,706 --> 00:34:32,388
AUDIENCE: What is it at the
right corner? [INAUDIBLE]?

502
00:34:32,388 --> 00:34:33,679
PROFESSOR: Yeah, OK, I'm sorry.

503
00:34:33,679 --> 00:34:37,730
It says-- this is a delta ri.

504
00:34:37,730 --> 00:34:39,530
It has double subscripts here.

505
00:34:39,530 --> 00:34:45,360
This is the displacement at the
point of application of force

506
00:34:45,360 --> 00:34:49,366
i due to the
virtual displacement

507
00:34:49,366 --> 00:34:54,120
of generalized coordinate j.

508
00:34:54,120 --> 00:35:01,350
So that an example might be,
if that's delta x over here,

509
00:35:01,350 --> 00:35:07,440
the summation is over
i, is over F1 F2 to Fi.

510
00:35:07,440 --> 00:35:13,090
And the deflection
is the deflection

511
00:35:13,090 --> 00:35:17,930
at the point of application
i due to-- in this case

512
00:35:17,930 --> 00:35:22,830
I'm talking about delta x-- due
to the virtual displacements

513
00:35:22,830 --> 00:35:25,010
delta x.

514
00:35:25,010 --> 00:35:27,930
And so that's-- we'd work each
one of these out and add them

515
00:35:27,930 --> 00:35:29,210
up, and we'd have the answer.

516
00:35:29,210 --> 00:35:33,370
But there is a more
explicit mathematical way

517
00:35:33,370 --> 00:35:34,350
of saying this.

518
00:35:34,350 --> 00:35:47,720
And that is to say that Qj
delta qj is the summation over i

519
00:35:47,720 --> 00:35:52,760
equals 1 to N, however
many there are,

520
00:35:52,760 --> 00:36:10,450
of Fi dot the derivative of ri
with respect to qj delta qj.

521
00:36:13,240 --> 00:36:14,880
What's that mean?

522
00:36:14,880 --> 00:36:17,500
So let's look at one of these.

523
00:36:17,500 --> 00:36:21,100
So force one, there's
a position vector R1.

524
00:36:24,760 --> 00:36:32,210
If I move in the x
direction a little delta x,

525
00:36:32,210 --> 00:36:36,910
this point moves over
delta x in that direction,

526
00:36:36,910 --> 00:36:40,810
in the x direction horizontally.

527
00:36:40,810 --> 00:36:50,190
Our position vector R1 has
potentially components in the y

528
00:36:50,190 --> 00:36:51,860
as well as components in the x.

529
00:36:51,860 --> 00:36:55,520
But I'm only changing
it in the x direction.

530
00:36:55,520 --> 00:36:58,590
So that portion of
the possible movement

531
00:36:58,590 --> 00:37:06,110
of R1 due to changes in just
one of the coordinates--

532
00:37:06,110 --> 00:37:10,010
in this case, I was doing
qx-- the derivative of R1

533
00:37:10,010 --> 00:37:12,850
with respect to
qx, so only a part

534
00:37:12,850 --> 00:37:16,780
of its total possible
movement is due to x.

535
00:37:16,780 --> 00:37:19,480
This gives us that portion.

536
00:37:19,480 --> 00:37:24,510
Times delta qx is
the total movement

537
00:37:24,510 --> 00:37:29,890
in the direction of qx
dotted with the force.

538
00:37:29,890 --> 00:37:31,610
You get the work done.

539
00:37:31,610 --> 00:37:37,600
So I find this-- if I were
you, this is highly abstract.

540
00:37:37,600 --> 00:37:40,180
I think we need-- let's
do an example of this

541
00:37:40,180 --> 00:37:43,610
and see how it works out.

542
00:37:43,610 --> 00:37:48,680
And since we were talking
about that problem,

543
00:37:48,680 --> 00:37:51,840
I'll do this cart
by this method.

544
00:39:13,610 --> 00:39:16,990
So I need a position
vector to the point

545
00:39:16,990 --> 00:39:22,190
of application of this external
non-conservative force.

546
00:39:22,190 --> 00:39:24,540
Because I'm calling
this force one,

547
00:39:24,540 --> 00:39:26,880
I'll call that
position vector R1.

548
00:39:26,880 --> 00:39:31,040
And it goes from here to there.

549
00:39:31,040 --> 00:39:34,530
But we know that the
total motion of this point

550
00:39:34,530 --> 00:39:36,970
is made up of the
motion of the main cart

551
00:39:36,970 --> 00:39:41,240
plus the motion of the wheel
relative to the main cart.

552
00:39:41,240 --> 00:39:45,100
And so we fall back
on our notation.

553
00:39:45,100 --> 00:39:48,080
So I'll say this is R1 and zero.

554
00:39:48,080 --> 00:39:51,970
Here's my point A.
It's R is the vector.

555
00:39:51,970 --> 00:39:57,940
This is R of A with
respect to o plus--

556
00:39:57,940 --> 00:39:59,860
and we'll better
give this a name.

557
00:39:59,860 --> 00:40:10,410
What have I-- so this
is my point one here.

558
00:40:10,410 --> 00:40:15,410
So this is plus R1
with respect to A.

559
00:40:15,410 --> 00:40:17,730
So we've done that lots
of times, this term.

560
00:40:17,730 --> 00:40:20,970
That's just how-- that point
is the sum of this vector

561
00:40:20,970 --> 00:40:22,735
plus this vector.

562
00:40:22,735 --> 00:40:29,230
So you have an R-- this is R1
with respect to A from here

563
00:40:29,230 --> 00:40:30,250
to here.

564
00:40:30,250 --> 00:40:32,790
And the sum of those
two is this one.

565
00:40:32,790 --> 00:40:36,170
So this is R1 here.

566
00:40:36,170 --> 00:40:41,070
OK, so let's see if we can come
up with an expression for that.

567
00:40:41,070 --> 00:40:53,800
Well, this point A is just x
in the I plus some Y in the J.

568
00:40:53,800 --> 00:40:56,500
That's this term.

569
00:40:56,500 --> 00:40:59,700
Then I need this one.

570
00:41:04,960 --> 00:41:07,500
So I want-- because I'm going
to take some derivatives

571
00:41:07,500 --> 00:41:10,360
and things, I want to
get everything in terms

572
00:41:10,360 --> 00:41:13,380
of unit vectors and one system.

573
00:41:13,380 --> 00:41:17,010
So I know this
one, this is my x1,

574
00:41:17,010 --> 00:41:21,210
and it will have a unit
vector i, lowercase i,

575
00:41:21,210 --> 00:41:23,390
in this direction.

576
00:41:23,390 --> 00:41:31,810
So the unit vector i here has
components in the capital IJ

577
00:41:31,810 --> 00:41:33,590
system.

578
00:41:33,590 --> 00:41:44,790
And this is theta,
and that's theta.

579
00:41:44,790 --> 00:41:51,830
So this has-- i has
a component here,

580
00:41:51,830 --> 00:42:00,360
which is cosine theta cap
I, and then this piece is

581
00:42:00,360 --> 00:42:20,430
minus sine theta J.
So this should be x1,

582
00:42:20,430 --> 00:42:26,990
the distance this thing
moves, broken into two pieces,

583
00:42:26,990 --> 00:42:35,330
cos theta I minus sine
theta J. So that's now--

584
00:42:35,330 --> 00:42:43,950
the position of this thing is
the position of the cart at A

585
00:42:43,950 --> 00:42:49,940
plus the vector that
goes from A to point one,

586
00:42:49,940 --> 00:42:53,330
which is the
distance x1 to here,

587
00:42:53,330 --> 00:42:55,510
broken into two pieces,
an I piece and a J piece.

588
00:43:01,820 --> 00:43:03,170
So now we're almost done.

589
00:43:03,170 --> 00:43:06,400
So I would like to find Qx.

590
00:43:10,900 --> 00:43:18,690
And Qx then should be the
summation-- well, let's see.

591
00:43:37,900 --> 00:43:41,950
So I'm only going to compute the
part of the generalized force

592
00:43:41,950 --> 00:43:46,030
in the Qx direction due
to just this one force.

593
00:43:46,030 --> 00:43:48,260
Now, remember we
have other forces,

594
00:43:48,260 --> 00:43:50,060
non-conservative
forces, acting on this.

595
00:43:50,060 --> 00:43:52,050
We've got a bx dot too.

596
00:43:52,050 --> 00:43:55,650
But I'm just going to do
the contribution to Qx

597
00:43:55,650 --> 00:43:58,360
that comes from this force F1.

598
00:44:01,040 --> 00:44:11,440
And so Qx delta x is
the virtual work done,

599
00:44:11,440 --> 00:44:21,180
is F1I dot partial of R1
with respect to x delta x.

600
00:44:26,740 --> 00:44:35,760
But the derivative of R1
with respect to capital

601
00:44:35,760 --> 00:44:39,820
X, there's no capital
X's over here.

602
00:44:39,820 --> 00:44:42,080
So nothing comes from that.

603
00:44:42,080 --> 00:44:43,690
There's one right here.

604
00:44:43,690 --> 00:44:46,530
So the derivative of x with
respect to x gives me 1.

605
00:44:46,530 --> 00:44:49,610
I just get 1 times I back here.

606
00:44:55,520 --> 00:45:02,280
F1 I hat dot I hat delta x.

607
00:45:02,280 --> 00:45:09,800
So it's just F1 delta x,
which we knew intuitively

608
00:45:09,800 --> 00:45:11,599
when we worked this
problem earlier, when

609
00:45:11,599 --> 00:45:12,640
we were talking about it.

610
00:45:12,640 --> 00:45:16,410
The amount of virtual
work that gets

611
00:45:16,410 --> 00:45:23,100
done by this particular force
in a deflection, virtual

612
00:45:23,100 --> 00:45:26,870
displacement delta x,
it's just F1 delta x.

613
00:45:26,870 --> 00:45:29,320
But we've proven
it-- we've done it

614
00:45:29,320 --> 00:45:34,640
in a very precise,
kinematic way where

615
00:45:34,640 --> 00:45:38,780
we found the position vector,
worked the whole thing out.

616
00:45:38,780 --> 00:45:40,080
So that's the simple one.

617
00:45:40,080 --> 00:45:49,765
Let's now find the harder
one, but not much now.

618
00:45:49,765 --> 00:46:09,600
So we'd like to find Qx1 due
to just this F1 only delta x1.

619
00:46:09,600 --> 00:46:19,690
Well, that should be
F1I dot partial of R1

620
00:46:19,690 --> 00:46:22,826
with respect to x1 delta x1.

621
00:46:27,030 --> 00:46:33,120
So the derivative of R1 with
respect to x1-- this stuff

622
00:46:33,120 --> 00:46:35,670
has nothing to do with x1.

623
00:46:35,670 --> 00:46:37,520
The x1 only appears over here.

624
00:46:37,520 --> 00:46:40,830
And the derivative of this
expression, just cosine I minus

625
00:46:40,830 --> 00:46:59,170
sine theta J.

626
00:46:59,170 --> 00:47:02,100
So I dot I is the only
part you get back.

627
00:47:02,100 --> 00:47:06,700
This is-- and I need a delta x1.

628
00:47:06,700 --> 00:47:13,230
F1I dot I is cosine
theta delta x1.

629
00:47:13,230 --> 00:47:30,170
So Qx1 and F1 only here
equals F1 cosine theta.

630
00:47:30,170 --> 00:47:37,100
So this time the motion
delta x1, only part of it

631
00:47:37,100 --> 00:47:40,530
is in the direction of F1.

632
00:47:40,530 --> 00:47:49,240
And that portion, by taking
this derivative here,

633
00:47:49,240 --> 00:47:53,640
we get the contribution to
this that comes from x1.

634
00:47:53,640 --> 00:47:57,300
And then dotted with
the force, we only

635
00:47:57,300 --> 00:47:59,350
take that component
of that motion

636
00:47:59,350 --> 00:48:01,650
in the direction of the force.

637
00:48:01,650 --> 00:48:03,550
And that gives us our
total virtual work.

638
00:48:03,550 --> 00:48:06,650
So here is then the
total virtual work

639
00:48:06,650 --> 00:48:11,860
done by F1 due to the
little motion delta x1.

640
00:48:11,860 --> 00:48:14,120
So now we've got the
contribution here

641
00:48:14,120 --> 00:48:23,300
to the generalized force that
is associated with deflections

642
00:48:23,300 --> 00:48:24,405
of coordinate x1.

643
00:48:28,180 --> 00:48:31,980
Is that the total
generalized force

644
00:48:31,980 --> 00:48:37,990
associated with generalized
coordinate x1 in this problem?

645
00:48:37,990 --> 00:48:42,140
Are there Any other
non-conservative forces

646
00:48:42,140 --> 00:48:46,516
in the problem that move
when delta x1 is moved?

647
00:48:46,516 --> 00:48:48,310
AUDIENCE: What about friction?

648
00:48:48,310 --> 00:48:50,136
PROFESSOR: Well, let's see.

649
00:48:50,136 --> 00:48:50,635
Friction.

650
00:48:53,890 --> 00:48:56,090
Friction, you're
presuming, on the wheel?

651
00:48:56,090 --> 00:48:56,850
OK.

652
00:48:56,850 --> 00:48:58,740
So he asked about
friction on the wheel.

653
00:48:58,740 --> 00:49:05,340
Well, let's say that there's
no slip in this case.

654
00:49:05,340 --> 00:49:07,960
Then does the friction
at the point of contact

655
00:49:07,960 --> 00:49:10,021
with the wheel do any work?

656
00:49:10,021 --> 00:49:10,520
No.

657
00:49:10,520 --> 00:49:14,230
So do we have to account for
it as a generalized force?

658
00:49:14,230 --> 00:49:15,930
No.

659
00:49:15,930 --> 00:49:18,115
So how about the dashpot?

660
00:49:20,740 --> 00:49:23,860
So a little virtual
deflection, delta x1,

661
00:49:23,860 --> 00:49:27,090
does it make the big cart move?

662
00:49:27,090 --> 00:49:27,590
No.

663
00:49:27,590 --> 00:49:31,580
So are there any other
forces in the problem

664
00:49:31,580 --> 00:49:37,293
that move when you cause
a small movement in x1?

665
00:49:37,293 --> 00:49:38,160
No.

666
00:49:38,160 --> 00:49:45,040
So in this case, this
is the total Qx1.

667
00:49:45,040 --> 00:49:48,580
Up here, we found Qx,
the generalized force

668
00:49:48,580 --> 00:49:53,820
due to the motion of a cart,
the contribution by F1.

669
00:49:53,820 --> 00:49:55,580
But is there another
contribution?

670
00:49:55,580 --> 00:49:56,376
AUDIENCE: Yes.

671
00:49:56,376 --> 00:49:57,250
PROFESSOR: And it is?

672
00:49:57,250 --> 00:49:58,320
AUDIENCE: The dashpot.

673
00:49:58,320 --> 00:49:59,278
PROFESSOR: The dashpot.

674
00:49:59,278 --> 00:50:02,440
So we get additionally
the total Qx

675
00:50:02,440 --> 00:50:07,650
here total would
be the summation

676
00:50:07,650 --> 00:50:12,510
of two pieces, an F1 and an
F2, which I'd call minus bx.

677
00:50:12,510 --> 00:50:15,000
It's in the same
direction as delta x.

678
00:50:15,000 --> 00:50:20,700
So you're going to get a
minus bx dot plus F1 would

679
00:50:20,700 --> 00:50:28,100
be the total generalized force
in the capital X direction,

680
00:50:28,100 --> 00:50:29,630
the movement of the main cart.

681
00:50:37,010 --> 00:50:43,830
So any time you can actually
specify a position vector

682
00:50:43,830 --> 00:50:47,380
to the point of application of
an external non-conservative

683
00:50:47,380 --> 00:50:55,910
force, then you can
just plug it into this.

684
00:50:55,910 --> 00:50:59,280
You do it at each
force that's applied.

685
00:50:59,280 --> 00:51:00,780
You take the
derivative with respect

686
00:51:00,780 --> 00:51:04,810
to that to coordinate
qj, delta qj.

687
00:51:04,810 --> 00:51:09,570
That is the virtual work
done by each of these forces.

688
00:51:09,570 --> 00:51:13,970
And you add up to get the
total virtual work done

689
00:51:13,970 --> 00:51:19,120
due to a deflection at that
particular coordinate, j.

690
00:51:19,120 --> 00:51:24,530
So in the case of capital of
Qx, we had two contributions

691
00:51:24,530 --> 00:51:33,250
because we had two forces on the
main cart, F1 and minus bx dot.

692
00:51:33,250 --> 00:51:36,120
And so the summation
in that problem,

693
00:51:36,120 --> 00:51:40,020
when this is capital
X, delta X, you

694
00:51:40,020 --> 00:51:41,770
have two contributions,
F1 and F2.

695
00:51:45,100 --> 00:51:53,950
Now, what else can I do
in the length of time?

696
00:51:53,950 --> 00:51:57,910
Actually, let me stop for a
moment there, think about this.

697
00:51:57,910 --> 00:52:01,160
Would you have any
questions about this?

698
00:52:01,160 --> 00:52:04,479
So we've described two ways
of getting generalized forces.

699
00:52:04,479 --> 00:52:06,270
One's kind of the
intuitive one, figure out

700
00:52:06,270 --> 00:52:07,686
how much it moves
in the direction

701
00:52:07,686 --> 00:52:09,270
and do the dot product.

702
00:52:09,270 --> 00:52:11,990
The other one is straight
mathematical way.

703
00:52:11,990 --> 00:52:12,620
Kinematics.

704
00:52:12,620 --> 00:52:17,520
Plug it in, take the derivative,
same thing will come out.

705
00:52:17,520 --> 00:52:19,340
So while you're thinking
about a question,

706
00:52:19,340 --> 00:52:21,560
I'll look and think what
I was going to do next.

707
00:52:27,930 --> 00:52:32,160
I know what I'll do next, but do
you have any questions on this?

708
00:52:32,160 --> 00:52:34,428
I'm going to do another
example of this.

709
00:52:34,428 --> 00:52:36,404
AUDIENCE: I have a question.

710
00:52:36,404 --> 00:52:37,890
AUDIENCE: I have a question.

711
00:52:37,890 --> 00:52:39,236
PROFESSOR: Ah, Christina, yeah.

712
00:52:39,236 --> 00:52:42,722
AUDIENCE: So I still
don't understand how

713
00:52:42,722 --> 00:52:46,706
if you're going to grab
the wheel and move it,

714
00:52:46,706 --> 00:52:48,698
how that doesn't move the disk.

715
00:52:48,698 --> 00:52:52,190
Because they're attached,
so I don't get it.

716
00:52:52,190 --> 00:52:57,200
PROFESSOR: Is the wheel--
it's all in how you specify

717
00:52:57,200 --> 00:52:59,830
your generalized coordinates.

718
00:52:59,830 --> 00:53:03,900
So in this problem, the
two generalized coordinates

719
00:53:03,900 --> 00:53:07,990
are this capital X in
the inertial system which

720
00:53:07,990 --> 00:53:11,630
describes the
motion of the cart,

721
00:53:11,630 --> 00:53:15,470
and little x1
describes the motion

722
00:53:15,470 --> 00:53:18,990
of the wheel
relative to the cart.

723
00:53:18,990 --> 00:53:22,960
And actually that allows
you to write this statement.

724
00:53:22,960 --> 00:53:27,760
This is only
relative to the cart.

725
00:53:27,760 --> 00:53:31,320
So the motion of the cart
plus the motion of the point

726
00:53:31,320 --> 00:53:34,510
relative to the cart gives
you the total motion.

727
00:53:34,510 --> 00:53:37,020
And you've picked
two coordinates

728
00:53:37,020 --> 00:53:40,020
that allow you to
describe those two things.

729
00:53:40,020 --> 00:53:45,070
So if you can-- in this
problem, if this is the cart,

730
00:53:45,070 --> 00:53:51,050
this is the wheel, I even have
a spring hooked to it here,

731
00:53:51,050 --> 00:53:56,130
if I move this a little bit,
the cart doesn't have to move.

732
00:53:56,130 --> 00:53:59,870
This going back and forth
accounts for x1 relative

733
00:53:59,870 --> 00:54:00,780
to this table.

734
00:54:00,780 --> 00:54:02,279
And the table's the cart.

735
00:54:02,279 --> 00:54:03,195
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE].

736
00:54:09,500 --> 00:54:12,140
PROFESSOR: You mean dynamically
because you're putting forces

737
00:54:12,140 --> 00:54:12,990
on it?

738
00:54:12,990 --> 00:54:13,900
Yeah, well it might.

739
00:54:13,900 --> 00:54:20,370
But that's not-- in a way,
you're asking the question,

740
00:54:20,370 --> 00:54:24,470
is the cart capable
of moving because you

741
00:54:24,470 --> 00:54:25,990
put a force in the wheel?

742
00:54:25,990 --> 00:54:29,250
You move the wheel, which puts
more spring force, which maybe

743
00:54:29,250 --> 00:54:30,835
that causes the cart to move.

744
00:54:30,835 --> 00:54:32,320
Yeah, that could happen.

745
00:54:32,320 --> 00:54:35,580
But that's not
the problem you're

746
00:54:35,580 --> 00:54:39,100
solving when you're trying to
find the generalized forces.

747
00:54:39,100 --> 00:54:44,830
You're, in fact, allowing
a single motion at a time.

748
00:54:44,830 --> 00:54:47,760
So if you're talking
about this motion,

749
00:54:47,760 --> 00:54:52,080
you have frozen the
motion of the main cart.

750
00:54:52,080 --> 00:54:54,530
And you figure out what
the consequence of that is.

751
00:54:54,530 --> 00:54:56,960
It does a little virtual
work because there's a force.

752
00:54:56,960 --> 00:55:00,600
And you get one of the
generalized forces.

753
00:55:00,600 --> 00:55:03,760
Then if you move the
cart, you fix the wheel,

754
00:55:03,760 --> 00:55:05,036
and the whole cart moves.

755
00:55:08,180 --> 00:55:11,150
But the amount that
this wheel moves

756
00:55:11,150 --> 00:55:14,140
is exactly equal to the
amount that the cart

757
00:55:14,140 --> 00:55:19,070
moves because you've now
fixed this relative position.

758
00:55:19,070 --> 00:55:22,040
And that's where you get
the first-- that's where

759
00:55:22,040 --> 00:55:25,350
you get the capital Qx term.

760
00:55:25,350 --> 00:55:30,850
Even know this force F1 is
applied here on the wheel,

761
00:55:30,850 --> 00:55:34,620
this wheel moves
when the table moves.

762
00:55:34,620 --> 00:55:39,460
But the table doesn't move
when this relative coordinate

763
00:55:39,460 --> 00:55:41,650
between the table
and here changes.

764
00:55:41,650 --> 00:55:42,690
It doesn't have to.

765
00:55:42,690 --> 00:55:45,370
This is free to move
when the table is frozen.

766
00:55:45,370 --> 00:55:48,370
Remember we talked about
complete and independent

767
00:55:48,370 --> 00:55:50,500
coordinates?

768
00:55:50,500 --> 00:55:57,180
x1 is independent of
capital X. If I freeze x1,

769
00:55:57,180 --> 00:55:59,360
and I make capital X
change, just the whole thing

770
00:55:59,360 --> 00:56:00,980
moves like that.

771
00:56:00,980 --> 00:56:04,320
If I freeze capital
X, x1 can still move.

772
00:56:08,220 --> 00:56:12,520
So you have to pick
independent coordinates.

773
00:56:12,520 --> 00:56:13,337
Yeah.

774
00:56:13,337 --> 00:56:15,348
AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE]
mass of the whole thing

775
00:56:15,348 --> 00:56:17,097
is much larger than
the mass of the wheel?

776
00:56:17,097 --> 00:56:18,098
PROFESSOR: Not at all.

777
00:56:18,098 --> 00:56:21,270
AUDIENCE: Because [INAUDIBLE]
if you have two massed connected

778
00:56:21,270 --> 00:56:22,978
by a spring, you
pull the first one,

779
00:56:22,978 --> 00:56:24,442
they kind of pull
each other along.

780
00:56:24,442 --> 00:56:27,074
So why don't you get the
pull-along effect over here?

781
00:56:27,074 --> 00:56:28,490
PROFESSOR: That's
a good question.

782
00:56:28,490 --> 00:56:30,890
It's similar-- it's
essentially the same question

783
00:56:30,890 --> 00:56:32,710
that Christina asked.

784
00:56:32,710 --> 00:56:35,310
He asked basically--
let's think about it.

785
00:56:35,310 --> 00:56:37,030
Let's do a problem like that.

786
00:56:37,030 --> 00:56:41,440
Let's have two carts and
a spring in between them,

787
00:56:41,440 --> 00:56:42,565
and they're both on wheels.

788
00:57:01,090 --> 00:57:03,230
This is a planar motion problem.

789
00:57:03,230 --> 00:57:05,780
Each of these bodies is
capable in planar motion can

790
00:57:05,780 --> 00:57:08,460
have x and y and a rotation.

791
00:57:08,460 --> 00:57:11,990
But because of constraints,
how many degrees of freedom

792
00:57:11,990 --> 00:57:13,030
does body one have?

793
00:57:17,140 --> 00:57:18,880
I hear one, right?

794
00:57:18,880 --> 00:57:20,020
I don't allow it to rotate.

795
00:57:20,020 --> 00:57:21,680
It's got two wheels.

796
00:57:21,680 --> 00:57:24,705
I don't allow it to go up
because it's on the ground.

797
00:57:24,705 --> 00:57:26,919
I only allow it to
move in this direction.

798
00:57:26,919 --> 00:57:28,210
Same thing to be said for this.

799
00:57:28,210 --> 00:57:29,310
Only one there.

800
00:57:29,310 --> 00:57:31,560
How many degrees of freedom
do I have in this problem?

801
00:57:34,660 --> 00:57:37,555
One for each mass, right?

802
00:57:37,555 --> 00:57:38,930
So I have two
degrees of freedom.

803
00:57:38,930 --> 00:57:42,530
How many generalized
coordinates do I need?

804
00:57:42,530 --> 00:57:47,990
So my generalized coordinate
for this one will be x1,

805
00:57:47,990 --> 00:57:51,595
and for this one
will be some x2.

806
00:57:55,900 --> 00:58:14,130
If you're going to do this
problem by Lagrange, and let's

807
00:58:14,130 --> 00:58:14,740
see.

808
00:58:14,740 --> 00:58:18,940
Let's put a force now to
get back to your question.

809
00:58:18,940 --> 00:58:22,220
Let's put a force here on one.

810
00:58:22,220 --> 00:58:23,120
And we'll call it F1.

811
00:58:27,490 --> 00:58:45,375
And the potential
energy-- actually, no, I

812
00:58:45,375 --> 00:58:46,558
don't want to do that.

813
00:59:04,860 --> 00:59:09,630
So the potential energy
for this is some 1/2k times

814
00:59:09,630 --> 00:59:12,060
the amount that you
stretch the springs, right?

815
00:59:12,060 --> 00:59:18,030
So you're going to-- the
difference between x1 and x2

816
00:59:18,030 --> 00:59:20,210
minus the unstretched length.

817
00:59:20,210 --> 00:59:26,300
So x1 minus x2 minus
the unstretched length.

818
00:59:26,300 --> 00:59:28,810
We'll call it l0.

819
00:59:28,810 --> 00:59:33,450
So this would be the
stretch of the springs.

820
00:59:33,450 --> 00:59:37,120
If the spring had
no length, then it

821
00:59:37,120 --> 00:59:41,640
would just be the difference
in these two positions squared.

822
00:59:41,640 --> 00:59:44,781
So my potential energy
looks something like that.

823
00:59:44,781 --> 00:59:46,280
Now we want to
compute the general--

824
00:59:46,280 --> 00:59:48,124
and you could use
Lagrange, and you

825
00:59:48,124 --> 00:59:49,790
could figure out two
equations of motion

826
00:59:49,790 --> 00:59:52,626
for this taking
your derivatives.

827
00:59:52,626 --> 00:59:54,000
But the point of
the question was

828
00:59:54,000 --> 00:59:57,840
about getting to the
generalized forces, right?

829
00:59:57,840 --> 01:00:08,100
So now the generalized
force Qx1 delta x1

830
01:00:08,100 --> 01:00:18,610
is F1 times the derivative of
R1 with respect to x1 delta x1.

831
01:00:18,610 --> 01:00:21,480
So how much does
the position vector

832
01:00:21,480 --> 01:00:27,120
from marking the position of
this cart, which would be R1--

833
01:00:27,120 --> 01:00:31,400
so R1 is in effect x1, right?

834
01:00:31,400 --> 01:00:32,930
It's a pretty trivial problem.

835
01:00:32,930 --> 01:00:36,300
So the derivative of R1 with
respect to x1 is just 1,

836
01:00:36,300 --> 01:00:39,750
and the amount that it
then moves is delta x1.

837
01:00:39,750 --> 01:00:44,910
So the virtual work done by
this force on that first cart

838
01:00:44,910 --> 01:00:52,070
is just Qx1 equals F1.

839
01:00:52,070 --> 01:00:55,190
That's the generalized
force caused

840
01:00:55,190 --> 01:00:57,480
by this first mass on the cart.

841
01:00:57,480 --> 01:00:59,885
What's the generalize force Qx2?

842
01:01:04,310 --> 01:01:09,830
Well, it's some F1.

843
01:01:09,830 --> 01:01:13,040
Actually, there's a dot here.

844
01:01:13,040 --> 01:01:26,870
This would be some x2 with
respect to x1 delta x1.

845
01:01:26,870 --> 01:01:31,220
But how much does
x2 move when you

846
01:01:31,220 --> 01:01:34,510
cause a little
virtual deflection

847
01:01:34,510 --> 01:01:47,460
of-- the virtual
work done if I cause

848
01:01:47,460 --> 01:01:50,310
a little deflection
of this one is

849
01:01:50,310 --> 01:01:53,800
equal to the summation
of the forces that

850
01:01:53,800 --> 01:01:56,040
act through delta x2.

851
01:01:56,040 --> 01:02:02,820
Now, if you move this
a little delta x1 here,

852
01:02:02,820 --> 01:02:08,120
we figured out that that
Qx1, the generalized force

853
01:02:08,120 --> 01:02:10,910
due to that, is indeed this.

854
01:02:10,910 --> 01:02:14,380
But what's the generalized
force associated

855
01:02:14,380 --> 01:02:16,520
with motion delta x2?

856
01:02:16,520 --> 01:02:20,060
Let's move this one
now a little bit.

857
01:02:20,060 --> 01:02:23,588
When you move that a little
bit, how much work does F1 do?

858
01:02:29,940 --> 01:02:32,430
So we need to get two
equations of motion, right?

859
01:02:32,430 --> 01:02:36,070
And you're going to get
1 by taking derivatives

860
01:02:36,070 --> 01:02:40,530
with respect to coordinate x1.

861
01:02:40,530 --> 01:02:45,630
You're going to get an
equation of motion, which--

862
01:02:45,630 --> 01:02:49,920
so EOM x1 associated
with x1 double dot

863
01:02:49,920 --> 01:02:56,440
here is going to have on the
right hand side some Qx1.

864
01:02:56,440 --> 01:02:57,990
And we figured out what that is.

865
01:02:57,990 --> 01:02:59,830
It's just F1.

866
01:02:59,830 --> 01:03:02,800
And we're going to get a second
equation of motion associated

867
01:03:02,800 --> 01:03:05,630
with x2 double dot,
the mass acceleration

868
01:03:05,630 --> 01:03:07,410
of the mass of the second one.

869
01:03:07,410 --> 01:03:11,585
And it's going to be equal
to some external forces.

870
01:03:11,585 --> 01:03:13,210
And there's other
terms in here, right?

871
01:03:13,210 --> 01:03:15,450
We have kx.

872
01:03:15,450 --> 01:03:19,191
You have your k terms
and so forth in here.

873
01:03:19,191 --> 01:03:21,690
But on the right hand side are
the external non-conservative

874
01:03:21,690 --> 01:03:22,190
forces.

875
01:03:22,190 --> 01:03:25,110
So are there any
non-conservative forces

876
01:03:25,110 --> 01:03:26,760
on the second mass?

877
01:03:26,760 --> 01:03:27,260
None.

878
01:03:27,260 --> 01:03:32,670
So what do you expect Qx2 to be?

879
01:03:32,670 --> 01:03:43,610
So to get back to your
point, when you're

880
01:03:43,610 --> 01:03:47,320
computing the
generalized forces,

881
01:03:47,320 --> 01:03:50,650
you freeze all of the
movements except one

882
01:03:50,650 --> 01:03:52,380
and figure out the work done.

883
01:03:52,380 --> 01:03:56,370
Even though in the
real system, force

884
01:03:56,370 --> 01:03:59,782
will result in
this whole system--

885
01:03:59,782 --> 01:04:01,490
that whole system will
move to the right.

886
01:04:01,490 --> 01:04:04,580
If I put a steady
force F1 on there,

887
01:04:04,580 --> 01:04:06,810
the whole system will go
off to the right hand side.

888
01:04:06,810 --> 01:04:10,500
That would be the solution
to the equations of motion

889
01:04:10,500 --> 01:04:12,000
that you end up with.

890
01:04:12,000 --> 01:04:16,790
But for the purpose of
computing the generalized force

891
01:04:16,790 --> 01:04:22,470
on each mass, you only
fix where the masses

892
01:04:22,470 --> 01:04:24,810
are at some instant in time.

893
01:04:24,810 --> 01:04:27,380
And then one
coordinate at a time

894
01:04:27,380 --> 01:04:28,930
cause a little
virtual deflection

895
01:04:28,930 --> 01:04:31,650
and figure out how
much work gets done.

896
01:04:31,650 --> 01:04:35,480
So see the distinction
between the solution

897
01:04:35,480 --> 01:04:37,060
to the full equation to motion?

898
01:04:37,060 --> 01:04:37,600
Yes, indeed.

899
01:04:37,600 --> 01:04:39,940
Everything's going to move
because of that force.

900
01:04:39,940 --> 01:04:41,550
And a little bit
of work that gets

901
01:04:41,550 --> 01:04:45,690
done due to the motion of
just one coordinate and then

902
01:04:45,690 --> 01:04:52,370
the other coordinate through all
of the non-conservative forces

903
01:04:52,370 --> 01:04:55,150
that are applied.

904
01:04:55,150 --> 01:04:57,110
Did that get to your question?

905
01:04:57,110 --> 01:04:59,398
All right.

906
01:04:59,398 --> 01:05:07,410
Now, I'll set up-- I don't think
I'll have time to finish this.

907
01:05:17,460 --> 01:05:21,410
So last time we had this
problem, this is this rod.

908
01:05:21,410 --> 01:05:24,410
It's got a sleeve,
and it's got a spring.

909
01:05:24,410 --> 01:05:27,760
And we figured out the potential
and kinetic energy equation

910
01:05:27,760 --> 01:05:28,720
to motion.

911
01:05:28,720 --> 01:05:30,191
This is a planar motion problem.

912
01:05:30,191 --> 01:05:30,690
It pivots.

913
01:05:33,580 --> 01:05:35,220
Thing can slide up and down.

914
01:05:35,220 --> 01:05:39,420
Requires an angle
theta and a deflection

915
01:05:39,420 --> 01:05:43,360
x with respect to the rod.

916
01:05:43,360 --> 01:05:46,610
And we figured out t
and v, and we found

917
01:05:46,610 --> 01:05:49,810
the equations of motion for it.

918
01:05:49,810 --> 01:05:53,230
So here's my system.

919
01:05:53,230 --> 01:06:15,130
Point A here, spring,
sleeve, theta, x1, y1.

920
01:06:22,630 --> 01:06:27,450
And the distance x1 was
measured from here to G,

921
01:06:27,450 --> 01:06:28,510
to the center of mass.

922
01:06:31,820 --> 01:06:32,425
That's x1.

923
01:06:35,730 --> 01:06:38,030
This is in the direction here.

924
01:06:38,030 --> 01:06:42,730
This is the i1 unit
vector direction.

925
01:06:42,730 --> 01:06:45,940
And the coordinate
system is my x1, y1.

926
01:06:45,940 --> 01:06:50,180
So x1, it's down
the axis like that.

927
01:06:50,180 --> 01:06:56,270
And this problem is a
planar motion problem.

928
01:06:56,270 --> 01:07:00,180
There's two rigid bodies,
the rod and the sleeve.

929
01:07:00,180 --> 01:07:02,850
And we can completely describe
the motion of the system

930
01:07:02,850 --> 01:07:05,890
with it has two
degrees of freedom.

931
01:07:05,890 --> 01:07:08,480
Theta defines the
position of the rod,

932
01:07:08,480 --> 01:07:11,170
and x1 defines the position
of the sleeve on the rod.

933
01:07:11,170 --> 01:07:13,100
So we have two
degrees of freedom.

934
01:07:13,100 --> 01:07:16,610
And when we work
this out, we end up

935
01:07:16,610 --> 01:07:20,050
with two equations of motion.

936
01:07:20,050 --> 01:07:24,690
And this was called M2.

937
01:07:24,690 --> 01:07:25,380
This was M1.

938
01:07:30,390 --> 01:07:34,140
So one equation of
motion was M2 x1 double

939
01:07:34,140 --> 01:08:15,780
dot That was one
equation of motion.

940
01:08:15,780 --> 01:08:19,300
And I'm just leaving
the generalized force

941
01:08:19,300 --> 01:08:21,529
out of this for a minute.

942
01:08:21,529 --> 01:08:22,384
We'll figure it out.

943
01:08:22,384 --> 01:08:23,800
And the second
equation of motion.

944
01:08:34,258 --> 01:08:35,752
This is the rod.

945
01:09:16,670 --> 01:09:19,410
So you get two
equations of motion.

946
01:09:19,410 --> 01:09:21,630
We worked it out in
the last lecture.

947
01:09:21,630 --> 01:09:27,010
And we can see this
accounts for the mass moment

948
01:09:27,010 --> 01:09:29,250
inertia of the rod,
mass moment of inertia

949
01:09:29,250 --> 01:09:33,910
of the sleeve with respect to
G. So parallel axis theorem

950
01:09:33,910 --> 01:09:36,479
adds another piece to it.

951
01:09:36,479 --> 01:09:38,680
The whole thing,
theta double dot.

952
01:09:38,680 --> 01:09:41,090
And then this is
just due to gravity,

953
01:09:41,090 --> 01:09:44,560
gravity acting on the rod,
gravity acting on the sleeve.

954
01:09:44,560 --> 01:09:46,109
And on the right
hand side, you need

955
01:09:46,109 --> 01:09:50,439
to get these Qx, your
generalized forces

956
01:09:50,439 --> 01:09:54,130
for generalized coordinate
x1 and generalized

957
01:09:54,130 --> 01:09:55,850
coordinate theta.

958
01:09:55,850 --> 01:10:00,540
So we did it, in fact
worked it out last time

959
01:10:00,540 --> 01:10:02,970
doing the intuitive approach.

960
01:10:02,970 --> 01:10:08,670
And what if we were
to try to do this then

961
01:10:08,670 --> 01:10:11,890
by the kinematic approach
that I described here?

962
01:10:21,880 --> 01:10:25,330
The force was applied here.

963
01:10:25,330 --> 01:10:26,450
It was horizontal.

964
01:10:26,450 --> 01:10:29,626
We called it F2 because it
was applied to mass two.

965
01:10:37,930 --> 01:10:40,810
And in order to
use this technique,

966
01:10:40,810 --> 01:10:42,940
we want now to compute Qx1.

967
01:10:50,880 --> 01:11:02,950
We have a force F2, and
it is in the-- which

968
01:11:02,950 --> 01:11:05,890
way do I want to do it?

969
01:11:05,890 --> 01:11:07,203
We'll have an inertial system.

970
01:11:17,840 --> 01:11:28,170
So we need to describe a
vector in-- I better not

971
01:11:28,170 --> 01:11:30,650
draw it out here.

972
01:11:30,650 --> 01:11:32,660
So I'll just set
this problem up,

973
01:11:32,660 --> 01:11:34,670
and we'll finish it next time.

974
01:11:34,670 --> 01:11:41,210
I have an inertial
system y and x.

975
01:11:44,480 --> 01:11:46,520
So that in this
system, this force

976
01:11:46,520 --> 01:11:52,550
would be F2 capital J
dotted with the derivative

977
01:11:52,550 --> 01:11:58,970
of some vector that
runs here to this point.

978
01:11:58,970 --> 01:12:04,470
And I'll call that R2 in o.

979
01:12:04,470 --> 01:12:13,350
So the derivative of R2
with respect to x1 delta x1.

980
01:12:16,731 --> 01:12:21,840
And if you can work this
out, then you're done.

981
01:12:21,840 --> 01:12:25,830
The key to this is
figuring out what is R2,

982
01:12:25,830 --> 01:12:28,990
and doing it in
unit vectors such

983
01:12:28,990 --> 01:12:30,930
that you can complete
this dot product.

984
01:12:33,950 --> 01:12:42,330
So how would you describe
what is this position to here,

985
01:12:42,330 --> 01:12:46,770
and what are its unit
vectors that break it down?

986
01:12:46,770 --> 01:12:50,560
Take this R2, and you
express it in terms

987
01:12:50,560 --> 01:12:57,300
of unit vectors in the inertial
capital I capital J system.

988
01:12:57,300 --> 01:13:01,590
And once you've done that,
you can take the derivative,

989
01:13:01,590 --> 01:13:05,600
dot it with that,
and you're done.

990
01:13:05,600 --> 01:13:07,019
So we'll finish that next time.

991
01:13:07,019 --> 01:13:09,060
You might go off and think
about it in your notes

992
01:13:09,060 --> 01:13:09,640
from last time.

993
01:13:09,640 --> 01:13:10,806
We already figured this out.

994
01:13:10,806 --> 01:13:12,910
We just did it
the intuitive way.

995
01:13:12,910 --> 01:13:15,420
Drew the F and figured out
which part's in the direction

996
01:13:15,420 --> 01:13:18,980
of x1, which part's in the
direction of delta theta.

997
01:13:18,980 --> 01:13:19,900
And we figured it out.

998
01:13:19,900 --> 01:13:21,770
So you actually already
have the answer.

999
01:13:21,770 --> 01:13:24,390
So go see if you can do that.